Attachment 1: Torrington Fire Department Apparatus Replacement Plan 2009
The following report has been put together after reviewing information provided by the Mercury Report, information gathered from previous replacement plans dating back to the Administration of Mayor Gryniuk , the Torrington Fire Department Master Plan 9/1/2006 and discussions between Fire Chief John Field, Board of Safety Commissioner James Potter and City of Torrington Fleet Manager Emil Castro and Deputy Chief Gary Brunoli.
There has been a long history to apparatus replacement and many changes. There has to be an understanding that this plan is fluid and may change with as the City grows and technological advances arise After reviewing the plan the Administration of the Torrington Fire Department would seek approval of this plan so the Department can move forward and provide the most professional and efficient service to the Citizens of the City of Torrington.
The plan is presented after processing all the information, we feel will save money from what was previously documented in the Mercury report. The plan also puts in place a rotation that is agreeable with the Fire Department and the City Fleet manager. The Mercury plan called for a rotation of vehicles every 7 years. After discussions with the Fleet Manager we are basing some of the decisions for replacement by using vehicle mileage, hours, and age as a determining factor as to when we should replace an apparatus. The plan calls for an apparatus to be on as first line for 12 years. At the 12 year mark the apparatus would be placed into the system as spare for the Department for another 12 years. We consider after reviewing all information that the life expectancy for our Career fire apparatus
to be 24 years. Changes in the City as well as the Fire Service will also dictate the apparatus life expectancy. When the Mercury Report was developed the Administration of the Fire Department had no contact with any representative that developed the Report. All information gathered was obtained through the former Fleet Manager. Information from the Fire Departments master plan was not considered due to the fact that we had to add an apparatus to the fleet due to the Departments future presence on the East Side of the City. The Department will have 2 spare pumpers to be put into service when a first line apparatus is down for service. The 2 spares are needed as part of the Department Operations during multiple alarm incidents. The long history of apparatus replacement has
had many plans that included and did not include the three City Volunteer Departments. This plan allows for inclusion of the three departments to allow for apparatus that will provide the citizens the proper service the Departments will provide. After reviewing the vehicle information with the Fleet Manager we did not feel that replacing the volunteer apparatus on the same 12 year rotation was warranted. We looked at the mileage, hours and age to see where and when the replacement of their apparatus would need to be replaced. Being that the plan is fluid changes in the City of Torrington and Fire service operations may require the need to make adjustments as the City and Fire Department evolves.
We studied the Mercury report, the recommendations and the overall concept of the plan. We believe that the plan was under funded to accommodate for the appropriate apparatus to provide the service to the Citizens of Torrington. The Fire Department Administration had no input into the development of the plan for the Mercury study which could have assisted in providing more accurate analysis. The Mercury report carried the cost of the apparatus out on a 3% per year increase. With all the research we have done a cost increase of 5% a year would have been more accurate. Also the cost of an apparatus was based on the last 2 pumpers that the Department purchased. If Fire Department Administration had been consulted as to what the needs would be for the Department we could have given a more accurate
figure of what the apparatus cost and needs would have been. I have compared the plan laid out in the Mercury report and placed it along side the plan of the Fire Department Administration. The Administration agrees that this plan will provide the needed apparatus to provide for the most efficient operations for the citizens of the City of Torrington. The plan is projected out 17 years from 2010 through 2026. We compared the Mercury report at 5% and the Fire Department plan at 5% and with the implementation of the Fire Department plan we would save an estimated $ 2,176,131. I have researched the funding of the replacement account since the purchases of Engine 1 and Engine 3. The Fire Department budget has allocated 1,072,476 over that period of time with no expenditures for major apparatus. We have been told that this
money has been allocated to the City wide replacement account. The money was still part of the overall Fire Department budget as a separate line item for each of the past years. The Fire Department Administration feels that the money that was accounted for in the Fire Department budget and should be available to fund our apparatus needs. As for the funding of the apparatus replacement account our budget reflects our contribution to the fund to be $ 72,049 for the 2009-2010 budget years. This amount has been significantly decreased from the contribution of $ 185,000 in the budget year 1999-2000. For the Department to properly fund the account so that we can purchase the vehicles as per the Mercury Report the Department would have to
increase our contribution $338,362or a total of $ 410,411 For the Department to properly fund the account as per the Fire Department plan it would have to increase our contribution $ 210,355 or a total of $ 282,404. At the present time $ 25,000 is placed into an account for Volunteer apparatus. At the present time there is $100,000 in the fund. The Fire Department administration feels that if we increase the fund $15,000 there would be money available to replace their vehicles when they came due using the parameters the Fleet Manager and the Deputy Chief agreed upon. There will be an explanation shortly as to how the vehicles will be replaced and rotated. The concept put forth through the Mercury Plan of purchasing vehicles with out having to finance would save money. If we could pay for the first vehicle from the fund and increase the contribution as stated above the Department Administration feels that we could accomplish the goal of replacing apparatus in a manner that will provide the most professional and efficient service for the Citizens of Torrington What follows is the plan of the Fire Department Administration.
Apparatus Replacement Plan Based on the Fire Department Master Plan of 2006 2009
2010 Pumper 400,000 Headquarters
2012 75’ Aerial/quint 551,250 East End
2104 Pumper 486,202 North End
2017 100’ Tower/Ladder 1,181964 Headquarters
2022 Pumper 718,342 Headquarters
2024 75’ Aerial/quint 989,965 East End
2026 Pumper 873,149 North End
There had been discussions for many years about replacing the Rescue. After review of the Master Plan and Department Operations. The Fire Department Administration feels with the apparatus we have planned we can work with TAC -9 and deal with anytime the State would request the vehicle. We feel that the vehicle TAC-9 should carry us through the year 2030. The Department feels that we could make recommendation as to the replacement after the year 2026 which at that time there may have been adjustments to the plan due to changes in the City, Department and technological advances.
The plan would work as follows:
The new pumper bought in 2010 would go into Headquarters. Engine 1 would become a spare and Engine 5 would be retired. (We may need to keep Engine 5 as a spare if we are on the East end before 2012 so we could still have 2 spares in the fleet)
In 2012 we would purchase a 75’ aerial/quint to cover the East End, and if we were to be on the East end before 2012 we could use Engine 1as that engine. We still would have engine 2 as the spare engine.
In 2014 we would purchase a pumper that would go to the North End and Engine 3 would become one of our spare engines. Engine 2 would be retired or (Torringford asked if they could have it to replace Eng 14) we have to remember through all the discussions it was determined that we would have 2 spare apparatus to cover all Departments in the City.
Due to funding and purchasing time tables I pushed off the 100’ tower/bucket ladder that would replace Ladder 2 from 2016 to 2017.
In 2022 when we start the next rotation replacing the vehicles we purchase in 2010-2014 we would be able to rotate a vehicle into the Volunteer Departments. We would be able to rotate an Engine with 12 yrs and Engine #3 for a few years to assist the Volunteers with replacement(also there will be money that has grown in the Volunteer Apparatus account to assist with the purchasing of a vehicle for them). These vehicles would be for Burville and Drakeville we would decide at that time. Who would receive which one? Torringford Eng 17 would not be slated for replacement until around 2030. This is all based on miles, hours and service of the vehicles. There has been an understanding through the multiple plans that we would have 2 spare apparatus to cover all of the departments. Each Volunteer Department would have a first line pumper and a utility/brush truck. Drakeville would be the one department with a Tanker as a 3rd piece of apparatus.
We have spent many hours of deliberation and thought using all the material, reports, studies and plans. We feel that this plan will give the Torrington Fire Service the proper complement of apparatus to effectively and efficiently provide the service that the Torrington Fire Service and Citizens of the City of Torrington will need now and into the future.
Respectfully, Gary Brunoli Deputy Chief of Operations Torrington Fire Department City of Torrington |