Planning Board
Village of Tarrytown
Regular Meeting
December 19, 2012; 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Chairman Friedlander; Members Tedesco, Aukland, Raiselis, Birgy; Village Engineer McGarvey; Secretary Bellantoni
ABSENT: Village Attorney Shumejda, Village Administrator Blau
APPROVAL OF THE MINTUES – November 26, 2012
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Ms. Raiselis, and unanimously carried that the minutes of November 26, 2012 Planning Board meeting be approved as submitted. Mr. Aukland abstained. Motion carried.
CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING – HAS-UWC - Jardim Estates East - Subdivision - Browning Lane - Findings
Mr. Aukland recused himself from this application.
Melissa Kaplan-Macey of BFJ Planning read the changes that were made as discussed at the November 26, 2012 meeting. The Board made a few additional changes for clarification purposes as follows:
Chairman Friedlander stated on page 9 regarding Wetland C, rather than stating that the applicant will work with the Planning Board, it should state that the applicant will provide appropriate mitigation measures to Wetland C which must be approved by the Village Engineer prior to subdivision approval.
Mr. McGarvey stated that the tree survey referenced on page 9 is almost five years old and the site has changed since then; some of the trees have come down. He asked if they Board was going to ask for an updated tree survey or do it lot by lot at site plan approval. The Board agreed that since they were not sure when the lots would be developed, the developer of each lot would have to provide a new/updated tree survey for site plan approval. Mr. McGarvey said they may not develop for another 10 years and the trees will be larger. If we stipulate that at site plan approval a new tree survey must be done, the owners will be aware of it.
Mr. Birgy asked about infrastructure work. Mr. McGarvey said that will be addressed at subdivision approval.
Chairman Friedlander asked if there were any other comments/questions.
Mr. McGarvey commented on the statement that the road is not going to be widened. The road varies from 14'-18' wide. The maximum road width will be 18' and generally will not be widened. There are some areas that cannot be widened because we cannot widen onto private property. The road meanders and there will be areas that will be filled in between the 16' to 18' in order to make it neat and somewhat consistent for the curbing that is going to be installed; will that be considered widening. Mr. Fitzpatrick said they will be providing the Village Engineer with a proposed design plan for the road; and if they use the term "generally" not widened, it will cover it. Mr. McGarvey said we will also need the Fire Department's approval of this road for the fire trucks access.
Mr. McGarvey asked what it means on page 14 where it states that the Gracemere neighborhood would not be in the HOA. Ms. Kaplan-Macey said it means the existing houses in the neighborhood. Mr. Fitzpatrick said the Church is required to set up a Homeowner Association which will only include the Church's property; the new lots and the houses the Church owns now, but all of the property owners have an obligation to share in the maintenance. The HOA will make an agreement with them to share in those expenses and they will also be able to join the HOA if they wish. There is no responsibility of the homeowners for the pond. Ms. Kaplan-Macey said she will discuss with Counsel Shumejda for proper wording.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Ms. Raiselis to close the Public Hearing. All in favor, motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Ms. Raiselis that the Planning Board approve the revised Findings for the Jardim Estates East residential subdivision dated December 19, 2012, which contains all the amendments approved by the Board at the November 26, 2012 Planning Board meeting.
In addition, the Board approves the satisfactory resolution of items identified in the Findings made at this Planning Board meeting as yet to be finalized.
All in favor; motion carried.
Upon approval, Mr. Aukland withdrew his recusal.
NEW PUBLIC HEARING – Loja - 44 Storm Street
The Chairman read the following Notice of Public Hearing:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Building, One Depot Plaza, Tarrytown, New York, to hear and consider an application by:
John Loja
44 Storm Street
Tarrytown, NY 10591
For site plan approval for property located at 44 Storm Street, Tarrytown, New York for construction of a one-story addition in the rear of the house to relocate the kitchen and reconfigure the existing space for the addition of two bedrooms.
The property is shown on the Tax Maps of the Village of Tarrytown as Sheet 40, Block 12, Lot 23 and is located in an M-1.5 (Multi-Family Residence) Zone.
Documents are available for inspection in the Planning and Zoning Office. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Access to the meeting room is available to the elderly and the handicapped. Signing is available for the hearing-impaired; request must be made to the Village Clerk at least one week in advance of the meeting.
By Order of the Planning Board
Dale Bellantoni
Secretary
DATED: December 10, 2012
The certified mailing receipts were submitted and the sign was posted.
Ms. Diane Loja of 44 Storm Street explained that the house is a three-family house with two rented units and one owner-occupied unit. The house presently has a 50’ rear yard and they would like to have a 15’ addition built onto the rear of the house for a new kitchen for the owner-occupied unit. This will leave them with approximately 33’ in the rear yard. She presented letters from the neighbors on the right and left at 40 and 46 Storm Street. Both have no objection to the addition. Ms. Loja said along with the addition, they will be reconfiguring the inside of the unit.
Chairman Friedlander asked if any variances will be required. Ms. Loja said for the side yard and rear yard.
Mr. Tedesco said that he visited the site and stated that the addition will not be seen from the street and does not feel it will be a disturbance.
Mr. Aukland stated that this is an area of existing non-conforming lots and this slight addition will not affect the area.
Chairman Friedlander asked if there were any more comments; none were made.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to close the public hearing. All in favor; motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, that the Planning Board declared itself Lead Agency for the proposed project. All in favor, motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, that there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this proposed action. All in favor; motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to approve the proposed site plan for a one-story addition to the rear of the house on 44 Storm Street subject to:
1. Approval by the Building Inspector/Village Engineer.
2. Approval by the Zoning Board for all variances required including the variance for the rear yard setback given the following facts:
a. The extension of the house does not exceed the existing extension in the rear yard in the case of the houses to either side.
b. There are many home along Storm Street built close to their property lines with essentially very small rear yard setbacks.
c. There is a garage and fence behind the applicant's property and; thus, the proposed extension would not be visible from the rear.
d. The neighbors to either side of the property have provided letters approving the proposal.
The Planning Board recommends that the variance for the rear yard setback be granted.
3. Payment of any outstanding escrow fee prior to the granting of a building permit.
4. Signing of the final site plan by the Planning Board Chair.
All in favor; motion carried.
NEW PUBLIC HEARING – Toll Brothers 214 Wilson Park Drive (Lot 6)
The Chairman read the following Notice of Public Hearing:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Building, One Depot Plaza, Tarrytown, New York, to hear and consider an application by:
Toll Land V Limited Partnership
60 Merritt Blvd., Suite 100
Fishkill, NY 12524
For site plan approval for property located at 214 Wilson Park Drive, Tarrytown, New York for construction of a new single-family home.
The property is shown on the Tax Maps of the Village of Tarrytown as Sheet 1.10 Block 1, Lot 30.6 and is located in an R60 (Single-Family Residence) Zone.
Documents are available for inspection in the Planning and Zoning Office. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Access to the meeting room is available to the elderly and the handicapped. Signing is available for the hearing-impaired; request must be made to the Village Clerk at least one week in advance of the meeting.
By Order of the Planning Board
Dale Bellantoni
Secretary
DATED: December 10, 2012
The certified mailing receipts were submitted and the sign was posted.
Jennifer Gray of Keane and Beane, attorney for Toll Brothers introduced herself and Chris Badger of Toll Brothers. Ms. Gray stated that they have made changes to the architectural elevations as per the comments from the Board at the November meeting which will improve the look of the back of the house. They also included an updated landscape plan as per the Village's Landscape Consultant, Lucille Munz.
Mr. Badger pointed out the location of lot 6 which is three lots over from the model home. He summarized the home as follows:
• Single-family house with 5 bedroom, 4½ bathrooms and a 3-car garage.
• Approximate square footage: 4600
• Height: 28'
• Width: 77'
• Depth: 63'
• Road elevation: 7' above road but a good portion of the house is not seen due to the protected hilltop area.
• Setbacks: Front: 110'; Left: 30'; Right: 43'; Back: 86'
• Energy STAR Certified
• Brick colonial with hardy plant siding
• No trees will be removed
Mr. Badger showed the revised rear elevation with the addition of a double window in the basement with decorative headers and shutters and a 300 s.f. deck with steps to the rear yard to break up the three-story appearance. Mr. Badger spoke with Lucille Munz regarding additional landscaping in the rear which will be seen from the trail. Ms. Munz walked the site and at her suggestion they have added three Balsams (12'-14' feet), three Red Oaks (3½' caliber) and seven White Spruce (12'-14' feet), a total of 13 additional trees to the original landscape plan.
Mr. Birgy asked about terracing the rear yard like the model home. Mr. Badger said the model home site was a very different site than this one and it was never intended to have a walkout basement. If they were to create terracing, they would have to bring in fill and eliminate some of the flat area where the homeowners will be doing their own hardscaping.
Ms. Raiselis suggested that the deck be extended to be seen from the side elevation, which will help to break it up.
Chairman Friedlander asked Mr. Birgy what he suggests they do.
Mr. Birgy said they could put in a few retaining walls and slope the property to soften it.
Mr. Badger said they are putting in small retaining walls.
Mr. McGarvey explained that they are digging out the back yard to get the walkout basement.
Mr. Birgy said the initial intention was to fit the house to the property, not make the property fit the house.
Mr. McGarvey asked if they were putting up a wall and filling behind it. Mr. Badger said yes to make somewhat of a play area for the owner.
Chairman Friedlander asked how far from the house will the wall be and how high. Mr. Badger said it will be about 20' from the house and they don't exceed 4' high; they go from 0 to 4'.
Mr. Birgy stated to Mr. Badger that you are digging out the backyard because you decided to make a walkout basement. Mr. Badger said the site dictated the walkout basement. The basement floor will be 3' above grade at the walkout. We added fill for frost protection and to allow for a foot and half step down.
Chairman Friedlander asked Mr. Badger to describe the walls and how far they are from the walking trail. Mr. Badger said there is an 86' backyard to the property line which is 15' from the trails; so the walls will be approximately 42'/43' from the trail. Chairman Friedlander asked for the dimensions of the wall. Mr. Badger said the wall wraps around the side and the maximum height is 4' and it tapers out on both sides of the house to 0 (zero) elevation. The length is a little bit less than the width of the lot which is 146'.
Mr. Raiselis asked if it would be made of stone. Mr. Badger said yes, the same as the model home.
Mr. Aukland asked the distance between walls. Mr. Badger said about 8'. Mr. Aukland said it is like a terrace then.
Chairman Friedlander asked if the trees shown on the plan between the wall and house are the ones that have been added and their size. Mr. Badger said yes they are the trees suggested by Ms. Munz and they are about 12'-14' high. Chairman Friedlander said they should break the view from the trail.
Mr. McGarvey stated that the average grade can't extend 30' from the mid point of the roof. Mr. Badger said its 28.3’ to the mid-point. Mr. McGarvey asked Mr. Badger to send him the calculations.
Chairman Friedlander said that on paper it may not look so great but it conforms. Mr. Aukland said it is not outrageous.
Chairman Friedlander said this is going to be a problem with all properties that slope down.
Mr. Birgy feels that a lot of attention is given to the front of these houses and not much to the rear of the house.
Chairman Friedlander stated that the deck is not very interesting and asked why it wasn't longer and has some design to it which might soften the back of the house better. Mr. Badger said their client is planning on putting in quite a bit of hardscape to the rear yard once they move in. Chairman Friedlander said their concern is to soften this very large house and how it is seen from the trail.
Mr. Birgy said the brick should be carried to the back of the house on the foundation instead of the siding to break it up. Mr. Badger said most of the homes in Wilson Park have the same treatment with siding. Mr. Badger said he would go back to their buyer to see if they are comfortable with doing that.
Veronica DeSanctis, 40 Lake Terrace, abuts the next property, does not like the three stories in the back because they are not very nice to look at, especially from the trail. The houses should fit into the environment. She feels it needs more planning to make it prettier.
Chairman Friedlander stated that a deck going from one side with a step down to a lower deck extending to the other side of the house would look better, especially with some curving.
Ms. Raiselis thinks they need to go back to their architects and tell them that they must come in with a better design the first time, which may only need a little tweaking. She appreciates some of their changes, but the deck needs to be better. It needs to blend into the site so that people walking the trail see something nice.
Mr. Aukland reiterated what Ms. Raiselis stated that this is an unusual site because all of the houses have both a front and rear public view and does not believe that we should continue to have this type of discussion. We are accepting the fronts but the backs should be made appealing too.
The Board agreed to continue the public hearing at the January meeting.
NEW PUBLIC HEARING – Toll Brothers 225 Wilson Park Drive (Lot 11)
The Chairman read the following Notice of Public Hearing:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Planning Board of the Village of Tarrytown will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, December 19, 2012 at 7:00 p.m. at the Municipal Building, One Depot Plaza, Tarrytown, New York, to hear and consider an application by:
Toll Land V Limited Partnership
60 Merritt Blvd., Suite 100
Fishkill, NY 12524
For site plan approval for property located at 225 Wilson Park Drive, Tarrytown, New York for construction of a new single-family home.
The property is shown on the Tax Maps of the Village of Tarrytown as Sheet 1.10 Block 1, Lot 30.11 and is located in an R60 (Single-Family Residence) Zone.
Documents are available for inspection in the Planning and Zoning Office. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Access to the meeting room is available to the elderly and the handicapped. Signing is available for the hearing-impaired; request must be made to the Village Clerk at least one week in advance of the meeting.
By Order of the Planning Board
Dale Bellantoni
Secretary
DATED: December 10, 2012
The certified mailing receipts were submitted and the sign was posted.
Mr. Badger of Toll Brothers showed the location of the lot on the north side of Wilson Park Drive. He recapped the size of the proposed house as follows:
• Single-family house with 4 bedroom, 3½ bathrooms and a 3-car garage.
• Approximate square footage: 4518
• Height: 26'
• Width: 75'
• Depth: 51'
• Road elevation: site 5 ½' below the road
• Setbacks: Front: 139'; Left: 27'; Right: 36'; Back: 102'
• Energy STAR Certified
• Hardy plant siding with cultured stone
• No trees will be removed
• It abuts the open space
Mr. Badger showed the revised elevations and additions made to the original plan. They treated the foundation with cultured stone, added a window to the family room with headers and shutters, replaced a single window with a double window in two locations, removed the palladium window and replaced it with a double window with headers and shutters as enhancements to the elevation.
Chairman Friedlander asked if there was a deck. Mr. Badger said no. The buyer plans on putting in a patio.
Mr. Badger stated the Ms. Munz, Village Landscape Consultant, walked the home site and reviewed the proposed plan. She asked that a note be added that a Certified Arborist should examine existing trees for dead or damaged trees which should be removed. She saw a few trees that she was concerned may be diseased. He stated that this house does not have a walkout basement.
Chairman Friedlander asked if there were any questions. No one responded.
Mr. Birgy brought up the issue of trucks coming onto the site and what is happening. Mr. Badger said they are handling the issues as best they can. If companies don't comply with the rules, they are fired. Ms. Gray reiterated that they are doing everything possible, but short of a Toll Brothers employee driving the trucks, they are doing everything they can. There is supervision on the site at all times.
Mr. McGarvey asked Mr. Badger to explain what is happening with the rest of Con Edison's utilities. Mr. Badger explained that when Con Edison put the gas line in they were suppose to put in electric and cable, but they did not; therefore they will have to open the trench again to install the rest of the utilities in a week or two. It is very frustrating for them, but it is an internal issue in Con Edison.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to close the public hearing on the site plan for lot 11. All in favor; motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, that there will be no significant adverse environmental impacts as a result of this proposed action. All in favor; motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to approve the proposed site plan for lot 11 (225 Wilson Park Drive) subject to the following conditions:
1. Approval by the Building Inspector/Village Engineer, particularly in regard to the adequacy of the stormwater/drainage plan and compliance with a construction management plan which includes construction guidelines, construction timelines and allowable construction traffic.
2. Approval of a landscape and screening plan by the Village Landscape consultant. Plantings should be native species or non-invasive ornamental. This condition is also to be recorded in the homeowner’s deed.
3. If any trees that are designated to be preserved are damaged due to site work, and subsequently need to be removed, the applicant agrees to replace them in kind. If this is not possible, then planting of multiple trees approved by the Village Landscape Consultant or payment of the appraised value of the trees to the Village Tree Replacement Fund will be required.
4. The applicant agrees to perform any treatment or pruning of trees deemed necessary by the Village Landscape Consultant, at a time the Consultant deems most suitable.
5. Adherence to the Section of the Zoning Code dealing with the Tree Replacement Fund for the removal of trees with a 10 inch caliper or greater OR alternative remediation elsewhere on the project site as approved by the Village Landscape Consultant.
6. Inspection of the Final Landscape and Screening by the Planning Board and Village Landscape Consultant before the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy (CO).
7. Any blasting activity determined to be required will be conducted in strict conformance with the Village's Blasting Code, and approved by the Village Engineer. Blasting is to be monitored by a company chosen by the applicant and approved by the Village Engineer. The cost of this monitoring is to be borne by the applicant.
8. Given that the project's stormwater management system has been designed such that there is no discharge for any driveway as the complete driveway run-off is infiltrated into the ground through the design of the infiltration systems which capture and treat 100% of the runoff even for a 100-year storm event, the Planning Board approves a waiver from the subdivision condition which requires that driveways be constructed of permeable materials.
9. A covenant will be placed in the Homeowner’s deed and in the Homeowner’s Association documents that prohibits the use of phosphate fertilizers. Organic, non-phosphate fertilizers may be used.
10. The architecture is to be reviewed by the Planning Board and approved by the Architectural Review Board (ARB).
11. During construction, a chain link fence will be placed around the drip line of any significant tree to be preserved within the proposed area of disturbance.
12. Payment of any outstanding escrow fees prior to the granting of a Building Permit.
13. Signing of the Final Site Plan by the Planning Board Chair.
Four approvals with Mr. Birgy recusing; motion carried.
Mr. Badger brought another issue to the Board's attention. Since they will be getting out of the Stone House, which is presently being used as their office, they are planning on renting a trailer to use as their office. The trailer is 32' long and will be placed on lot 2 and used for the remainder of the project. Chairman Friedlander asked if he had a bathroom. Mr. Badger said yes. Mr. Aukland said that since it's temporary he did not feel it needed any action. Mr. McGarvey agreed and said Mr. Badger just wanted to run it by the Board for their comments.
PRELIMINARY PRESENTATION – Jones - 23 John Street
Mr. Tedesco said even though the applicant for 23 John Street is not present he wanted to run some things by Mr. McGarvey. Mr. Tedesco said according to the diagram, they would have to remove one parking space from the street and the two off-street parking spaces would have to be in the side yard setback. Mr. Tedesco feels that this would set a dangerous unacceptable precedence for the entire Village. Mr. Aukland felt the same but thought the argument could be that since he is presently parking in the street, he would be taking his car off the street and adding an additional off-street parking space. Mr. McGarvey explained that one of the things that are allowed in the side yard setback is a driveway. Mr. Aukland said the other properties have the same arrangement.
Ms. Raiselis asked why they had to come before them if it’s allowed. Chairman Friedlander said because they are taking away a parking space from a public street. Mr. Tedesco asked if the Board of Trustees has to vote on it. Mr. McGarvey said he thought so as well; but after speaking to Mr. Blau about it, he said it is up to the Planning Board.
The Board decided to move this application to a Public Hearing. Mrs. Bellantoni will inform the applicant that the Board would like him to provide additional information showing similar situations on the street for the January 17, 2013 Staff Meeting.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, that the Planning Board declares their intent to be Lead Agency; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to set a $2,500 escrow; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to set a Public Hearing for the January 28, 2013 meeting; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Birgy stated that he thought a homeowner was allowed by right to have a driveway on his property; so why do they need Planning Board approval. Mr. McGarvey said yes they are but it has to be approved by the Planning Board just like a driveway for new homes do; and this case it is because they are removing an existing parking space from the street.
PRELIMINARY PRESENTATION – Greystone - 612 South Broadway (Lot 5)
The applicant, Andy Todd, showed the overall site plan of lot 5, which is on the southern part of the development down near Tarryhill. The lot is 127,252 s.f. or 2.9 acres, which is double the minimum allowed. The building coverage allowed is 12% and this will be 8.6%. The allowable impervious surface is 17,700 s.f. and this lot will have 10,765 s.f.
Historically it is the grounds where the grounds keepers’ cottages were. It is relatively flat with some plateaus. Similar to lot 7, the house is sited as far away from Tarryhill as possible. There will be minimal grading. The house will have a walkout basement. There are no trees where the house is sited or where the pool is sited.
Mr. Todd showed pictures of the elevations. It is an old Georgian style house with stone siding, slate roof, copper gutters and other high-end details as they have done in the past. He showed the exterior of the house with open porches and an active widow's walk.
The house has been placed as far north as possible so that it is away from Tarryhill and it faces northwest, which is away from Tarryhill. The pool is as far away as you can get from Tarryhill. The plateaus give it quite a bit of privacy from Tarryhill.
They will be asking for a small lot line change in order to get as far away from Tarryhill without disturbing steep slopes.
Mr. Todd said the lot line change will decrease lot 6 by 428 s.f and lot 1 will be decreased by 3,785 s.f. It allows them to transition the pool in order to respect the neighbors and be as far way from Tarryhill as possible.
Mr. Tedesco asked the following questions:
Any steep slopes? Mr. Todd responded, no.
Any wetlands? Mr. Todd responded that there was one but you gave us permission to encroach on it; but they are not going to.
Any variances needed? Mr. Todd responded, no.
Ms. Raiselis asked if there is a landscape plan. Mr. Todd said he is going to request a site visit and they will provide one after the visit.
Mr. Tedesco asked that he show on the next site plan all trees they have to be removed, the nature of them, the size of them and their location.
Mr. McGarvey asked if the FAR for this house is actually 14,990 s.f., as shown on the Zoning Compliance Chart; or is that the maximum. Mr. Todd said that is the maximum and the actual is 11,483 s.f.
Mr. Todd stated that the mean roof elevation is 30'. He gave the following square footages of the house:
• First Floor: 4,761 s.f.
• Second Floor: 4,407 s.f.
• Garage: 905 s.f.
• Attic: 1,410 s.f.
Mr. McGarvey asked how many bedrooms; Mr. Todd said six.
Mr. Birgy asked if he looked into the geo-thermal that they spoke about. Mr. Todd said yes and they working on it and is very likely they will go with it. Mr. Birgy asked if they looked into water conservation. Mr. Todd said they looked at it a lot but you need a lot of barrels which did not seem to catch enough water. Mr. Birgy said there are other methods like storing in underground tanks. Mr. Todd said they would look further into it and report back at the next meeting.
Mr. Todd explained the second lot line change where the road will be moved by 5'-20' because they found a lot of rock and this would avoid blasting.
A site visit was scheduled after the January 17, 2013 Staff Meeting.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, that the Planning Board declares their intent to be Lead Agency; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to set a $2,500 escrow; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to set a Public Hearing for lot 5 the January 28, 2013 meeting; all in favor. Motion carried.
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, to set a Public Hearing for the lot line changes for the January 28, 2013 meeting; all in favor. Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Tedesco moved, seconded by Mr. Aukland, and unanimously carried, that the meeting be adjourned – 9:20 p.m.
Dale Bellantoni
Secretary
| 
