ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Thursday October 25, 2007
8:15P.M.
Village Hall
80 Wheeler Avenue,
Pleasantville, New York
AGENDA
1. Case No. 2007-15– GDJD Corp- 32 Orchard Street , Pleasantville, New York- Proposal to construct a second floor addition on site in violation of section 185-46.A(1) “Non-Conforming Building and Uses”, and section 185-36.B(1) schedule I “bulk requirements” regarding an insufficient side yard setback and section 185-46.C.(2) “exceptions” which prohibits the expansion of a pre-existing non-complying building when the expansion increases the degree of existing building non-compliance thereof CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING
2. Case No. 2007-21– Mr. and Mrs. Mark Pawlowski – 107 Manville Road , Pleasantville, New York- Proposal to construct a front porch and dormer addition on site in violation of section 185-36.B(1) schedule I “bulk requirements” regarding insufficient side yard setbacks and section 185-46.C.(2) “exceptions” which prohibits the expansion of a pre-existing non-complying building when the expansion increases the degree of existing building non-compliance thereof
3. Case No. 2007-22– Mr. Joseph Vedovino – 170 Bedford Road, Pleasantville, New York- Proposal to construct an addition to an existing single family residence and convert the dwelling to a new two family residence along with a new detached three car garage in violation of section 185-36.B(1) schedule I “bulk requirements” regarding insufficient bulk standards, section 185-13B.(2)(a)(b) “accessory uses” and section 185-46.C.(2) “exceptions” which prohibits the expansion of a pre-existing non-complying building when the expansion increases the degree of existing building non-compliance thereof
4. Case No. 2007-23– Mr. and Mrs. Claudio Pippo – 80 Clinton Avenue , Pleasantville, New York- Proposal to allow an above ground swimming pool to exist as constructed on-site in violation of section 185-12.B(3) “accessory uses” regarding insufficient bulk standards and section 185-46.C.(2) “exceptions” which prohibits the expansion of a pre-existing non-complying building when the expansion increases the degree of existing building non-compliance thereof
5. Case No. 2007-24– Mr. and Mrs. David Darmanovic – 11 Douglas Drive , Pleasantville, New York- Proposal to re-construct a deteriorated retaining wall on site in violation of section 185-36.B(1) schedule I “bulk requirements” regarding an insufficient side yard and front yard setback
| 
