PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
August 20, 2008
Call to Order: 6:33 p.m.
ROLL CALL: Present for the Planning Board were: Timothy E. Moore, Chairman; Steven Ranlett, Vice-Chairman; Peter Bealo; Barry Weymouth (arrived at 7:07 p.m.); and Neal Morin, Alternate. Robert Gray, Selectmen Ex- Officio; and Merilyn Senter, Alternate, were excused.
Also present was Leigh Komornick, Planner.
N. Morin was appointed as a voting member in place of B. Weymouth (note: B. Weymouth arrived at 7:07 p.m. and N. Morin was no longer a voting member after his arrival).
Minutes of the August 6, 2008, Meeting
P. Bealo moved, second by S. Ranlett, to approve the minutes of the August 6, 2008, meeting. There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
A Public Hearing on a site plan review application to show the location of existing vehicle sales area and associated improvements at 89 Newton Road, Tax Map 68, Lot 9 and Tax Map 69, Lot 56 totaling 12 +/- acres and 880 +/- feet of frontage located in the ICR District. ~The owner of record is Maureen N. Leandro.
Dan Johnson, Plaistow Consultants, was present for the application. He reminded that this was a partial site plan update to include the small building as an office for auto sales and paving. D. Johnson noted that they are allowed to display ten (10) vehicles for sale under their salvage yard license. He added the intent was to clean up the site and make it more respectable looking. D. Johnson explained they had been granted a driveway permit and that the main office would remain in the primary building. He added they would be re-grading some of the lot, adding paving, a retaining wall and a fence around the saleable vehicles. D. Johnson offered that there had been an engineering review of the proposed changes. He added that they had submitted a letter requesting a waiver for a separate lighting plan
as they were not intending to change any of the existing lighting.
There was a discussion regarding some of the notes on the site plan regarding lighting.
P. Bealo suggested that, if it was decided later to make minor lighting changes, that the make and model be submitted to the Building Inspector prior to installation to make certain that the fixtures are compliant.
L. Komornick verified that CLD had signed off on the plan.
D. Johnson noted that a treatment swale had been added to the drainage plan based upon CLD comment.
S. Ranlett moved, second by N. Morin, to accept the amended site plan for motor vehicle sales at 89 Newton Road. There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
Waiver Requests:
S. Ranlett moved, second by P. Bealo, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.BB (locations for offsite structures). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
S. Ranlett moved, second by P. Bealo, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.Y (boundary lines). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
S. Ranlett moved, second by P. Bealo, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.YY (elevations of buildings). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
P. Bealo moved, second by N. Morin, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.LL (traffic circulation). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
S. Ranlett moved, second by N. Morin, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.HH (separate landscaping plan). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
P. Bealo moved, second by S. Ranlett, to grant the request for a waiver from §230-14.1.II (separate lighting plan). There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
There was additional discussion regarding labels for some of the existing lighting, such as for the roof sign, and designations such as “proposed” on some of the lights. D. Johnson reiterated there was no plan to add any more lighting to the site at this time. There was discussion about “note 7” on the amended plan, which referenced lighting. It was decided that the note was to be removed.
P. Bealo moved, second by N. Morin, to approve the amended site plan for 89 Newton Road with the following conditions:
- Removal of note #7 from the finalized plan
There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
A Public Hearing on a site plan amendment for a property previously approved for a contractor’s yard (including associated outside storage, office and warehouse space), and future tenant spaces for tradesmen and others utilizing a mix of office and warehouse space. ~The proposal is to reassign a portion of the existing building(s) and site for the manufacture of concrete building panels, and another portion for refurbishing mechanical equipment and the fabrication and assembly of mechanical equipment (including storage, office space, and warehouse/commercial space for both uses). ~~~The property is located in the industrial zone at 144 Main Street, Tax Map 41, Lots 12 and 13, totaling 37+/- acres. The owner of record is Testa Realty, LLC.
Present for the application were: Charlie Zilch, SEC and Associates; Attorney Bernard Campbell, Beaumont and Campbell, PA; Attorney Stephen Cicatelli, Massachusetts Counsel for Testa Corp.; Abdi Behjat, CEO Testa Corp.; Dan Shields, property manager for Testa Corp. at 144 Main Street; and John Green, Green Machine (proposed tenant).
B. Campbell offered that this was the third time they had been before the Board regarding this site. He reminded the Board of the details and location of the site and that there had been previous site plan approval for a contractor’s yard for Testa Corp (Testa). Mr. Campbell reminded of the interior layout of the building, noting the space intended to be occupied by Green Machine. He reminded the Board of the type of business that Green Machine conducts and recalled that the issue of Green Machine being a permitted use in the Industrial District had been resolved at a previous meeting. Mr. Campbell added that there were notes proposed for the plan that were specific to Green Machine, which included number of employees, hours of operation and anticipated traffic information.
P. Bealo asked if anything had been changed from the last time the Board had reviewed the plan.
L. Komornick replied that references to Fabcon had been removed.
B. Campbell questioned if the Board wanted him to continue his presentation, noting that the jurisdiction had not yet been accepted by the Board.
T. Moore asked Mr. Campbell to continue with his presentation.
B. Campbell reminded that Green Machine purchases and refurbishes materials handling equipment, such as conveyors, balers and the like, for resale. He added that in the future they would like the ability to manufacture some of their own equipment. Mr. Campbell distributed a prepared packet regarding Green Machine and addressed some of the issues that had been raised at previous meetings noting the following:
Washing of the equipment: It was noted that this particular type equipment has a very long life span (25-30 years) and some of it does need to be cleaned up. He explained that a closed re-circulating, evaporating system was used.
Hydraulic fluids: MSDS sheets are being provided on all hydraulic products, which were noted to be environmentally friendly and not rated as hazardous materials. It was noted that the type of fluids used were designated for environmentally sensitive areas and any waste was collected and burned for fuel.
Paint Spray Booths: A letter of clarification has been obtained from David Bowen, NHDES (New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services), and while the current Ground Water Management (GWM) Plan does not come into play, Green Machine will be required to obtain an Air Resources permit, and will do so, prior to operating the spray booth. It was suggested that the Air Resources permit could be handled as a condition of approval.
B. Weymouth arrived at 7:07 p.m. (Note: N. Morin no longer a voting member.)
B. Campbell continued that he had received notification from NHDOT (New Hampshire Department of Transportation) that the driveway permit will be issued.
P. Bealo noted that the information in the packet that was said to be for the evaporating system was actually for a residential boiler.
J. Green apologized and noted that the system they used operated much like a household device in that it heats a product and evaporates water. He added that it was a gas fired system that heats a liquid causing water to evaporate and any residue that was created would be collected and contained and disposed of by Clean Harbors.
P. Bealo stated that he would like to see the paperwork on the actual system that would be used at this facility.
L. Komornick asked what happened to the bollards that were supposed to be installed to protect the wetlands per the original site plan for Testa.
C. Zilch stated that the note for the bollards was still on the site plan under Testa’s notes.
L. Komornick noted that they were not in place at the site.
D. Shields explained that he and Mike Dorman had driven the site and there are signs up all along the area designated to be protected. He noted that they had used “flexi-floats” and the signs were spaced sixty (60) feet apart, which is closer than the site plan called for.
L. Komornick questioned if bollards were being used.
D. Shields noted there were metal pipes with signage, reminding that the note on the plan called for bollards or something deemed sufficient by the Code Enforcement Officer. He added that the plan called for 100 feet of protection and they had provided protection of the entire area.
L. Komornick noted that M. Dorman had asked her to bring forth the question of fixing the pavement on the site and ask if he should be mandating these improvements at this time.
T. Moore reminded that it needs to be addressed before tenant occupancy permits will be issued.
D. Shield noted that Chart was the only business out there at this time.
S. Cicatelli offered that improvements to the site driveway had been made and his client will continue to make improvements as per the initial site plan.
L. Komornick reiterated that M. Dorman was looking for guidance from the Board and asking for their interpretation as to whether or not, per the site plan, the pavement needs to be done before a CO (certificate of occupancy) is issued to Green Machine.
T. Moore suggested that the issues be addressed as part of the approval.
L. Komornick noted that there had been a review of the notes to make sure that nothing from the initial approval was lost with this new plan.
T. Moore asked if there were any additional questions from the Board. There were none at this time.
T. Moore offered abutters the opportunity to make comment or as questions.
Dennis Marcotte, 165 Main Street, offered that he had concerns over the hours of operation.
B. Campbell explained that “note #5” on the plan allowed for hours of operation form 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday, noting that these were the same business hours listed for Testa on this site. He added that all activities are within the building and he didn’t anticipate that there would be any significant noise impact. Mr. Campbell added that there would be an average of five (5) trucks in and out of the site in a week’s time.
P. Bealo expressed concern, with Pollard School being so close, over 18-wheeler trucks traveling in the area at the hours when children might be walking to/from school.
B. Campbell noted they would not be entering or leaving the site by coming past Pollard School.
P. Bealo offered that there was no real way to enforce that.
B. Campbell offered that the railroad tracks offered a physical barrier to trucks coming in from the direction of Pollard School as the flat beds would scrape bottom on them. He reminded that there was a sign posted for those exiting the site that they are to left turn only when exiting the site.
J. Green added that their current hours of operation where from 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. and they don’t schedule deliveries prior to that time.
D. Marcotte asked if there were any future plans for 24/7 operations.
J. Green replied that there were not.
D. Marcotte suggested to the Board that since this business was located in the area of the Village District they should not be allowed 24/7 operations.
T. Moore assured that the hours of operation were listed on the site plan and for them to deviate from those hours would require that they come back to the Planning Board.
D. Marcotte asked if drivers, who come late in the day or after hours, would be allowed to park on the site and sleep in their trucks.
J. Green replied that they didn’t allow that to happen.
Madeline Marcotte, 165 Main Street, asked if the hours could be restricted more and shorted on Saturday. She offered that this was a Village District and she had seen a drastic increase in the traffic over the twenty (20) years that she had been living in town. She suggested that trucks stopping when the train passes were contributing to poor air quality and that was of great concern to her. Ms. Marcotte noted that she already had traffic concerns with the back-up created when the train passes. She added that she also had concerns about the effects on water quality in the area.
B. Campbell reiterated that Testa already had those hours of operation approved as part of their site plan and they were turning over part of their site to Green Machine. He added that Green Machine, which was a less intensive use than Testa, may not use all those hours that are reserved on the site plan. Mr. Campbell noted that the traffic for Green Machine will be far less than what Testa proposed. He reminded that they had spoken with David Bowen, NHDES, regarding the water usage and that there was a GWM Plan in place for this property. He noted that Green Machine’s use changes nothing about that, adding that Chart Industries has an ongoing obligation to comply with the GWM Plan. Mr. Campbell added that they have acknowledged the need to obtain an Air Resources permit with reference to the spray booth
and details about the products used and their safety would have to be sent to the State before they would issue such a permit. He added that the machines would be cleaned by use of a re-circulating evaporation system and all residues would be collected and shipped off via Clean Harbors.
M. Marcotte asked again if the hours could be changed on Saturdays.
B. Campbell reminded that these hours coincided with the hours already granted for Testa.
S. Ranlett asked Mr. Green if they work on Saturdays.
J. Green replied that it was rare but they would sometimes do paperwork on Saturdays or work on a machine if they had gotten behind on a job.
M. Marcotte asked if the hours on the plan could be changed in the future.
T. Moore answered that when they are initially designating hours on a site plan they try to provide for some flexibility for the business, while being sensitive to the residents.
M. Marcotte offered that based on history she had little faith in the businesses as they had been taken by surprise many times. She noted that she still had concerns about the air quality and the water and was not as comfortable as the Board seemed to be that there wouldn’t be issues.
L. Komornick offered that there would be a great deal of oversight as far as the air quality permit. She added that Chart had previously held such a permit but that it was not transferable to Green Machine so they would have to re-apply.
Jim Hughes, Facilities Manager for the Timberlane Regional School District, reminded that there are 460+ children at Pollard School and there was great concern over air quality for the students there.
B. Campbell explained that the painting function was not something that would be happening every day and likened it to someone painting their house. He noted that it could take weeks to repair a single piece and they might work on 2-3 pieces a month. He reminded that all such issues would be reviewed as part of the Air Resources permit.
L. Komornick suggested that the abutters could also express their concerns to NHDES.
P. Bealo added that abutters could review the materials that were submitted to the Board this evening. He added that it was a lot to be handed and he was not prepared to vote this evening as he would like to review the materials. P. Bealo suggested that Green Machine might gain some understanding and good PR by offering an open house at their other location.
Chris Kirlis, 134 Main Street, noted that he had been to all of the meetings regarding this site and had heard all of the valid concerns raised by the abutters. He offered that all of his concerns were for the children in the area, who he called the future of the Town. Mr. Kirlis said that he felt the Board had given Testa “carte blanche” and now the Town was stuck with them. He said that should the business do well then they would be using every bit of all those business hours that the Board allowed for them. Mr. Kirlis said that he wasn’t against people having successful businesses but he didn’t think it should be at the expense of the residents and the children. He suggested that the Board should have the right to restrict the hours of new tenants who would like to go into the site and
if a business doesn’t want to comply they can go somewhere else. Mr. Kirlis added that everything should be done for the children and to make sure they have a nice place to live.
Myron Sorenson, 134 Main Street, asked how many trucks and what size would be on the roads per day.
B. Campbell explained that it was noted on the plan that there would be one (1) to two (2) service trucks (box style) and one (1) to two (2) tractor-trailer trucks per day. He added that Mr. Green indicated to him that they may not even meet that number on a regular basis, noting that once a piece of equipment was received it took time to refurbish.
P. Bealo reminded that all traffic would be directed to head north out of the site.
D. Marcotte recalled that he was once making a propane delivery to Pollard School and a small amount leaked out and there were all kinds of people asking him what was going on. He asked if Mr. Green would be working on several machines and then painting them all at the same time.
L. Komornick offered that she felt very strongly that these issues would be important to address to the State as part of their permitting process.
B. Campbell added that they would have to provide the State with all the information on the equipment and the materials as part of the permit application.
J. Green noted that due to the large size of the pieces they were not easily maneuvered and it was very time consuming to prepare a piece, paint it, and then allow the proper drying time. He said it would be a miracle if he could get more than one piece done in a day.
Tom Campo, 156 Main Street, asked how the noise will be regulated during the normal business operating hours.
B. Campbell noted that the ceilings in the bays were very high, which was one of the reasons why they wanted the units, to fit the crane equipment.
T. Campo asked about keeping the doors closed to mitigate the noise.
B. Campbell added that the primary entrance faces the railway spur.
T. Campo asked if there was only one (1) main bay door.
B. Campbell confirmed that to be correct.
T. Campo expressed concern that in the summer months it would be tempting to keep the doors open and he questioned how noise would be controlled.
B. Campbell reminded that this was a 30+ acre site and was many hundred feet away from Main Street. He added that the trains make more noise than any process going on at the site. B. Campbell also added that much of any noise would be absorbed before it could reach the abutters.
T. Campo asked about the increase in traffic with the employees coming and going from the site.
B. Campbell offered that there would be 15-20 full and part time employees.
T. Campo noted that they were only talking about this one company and there would eventually be requests for others.
B. Campbell reminded that at one point in time there were 480 people working at this site. He offered that Green Machine would be a very small operation on this industrial site. Mr. Campbell added that they were sensitive to the fact that this site was abutted by a residential community. He noted that the community made the decision on this property being designated for industrial use a long time ago.
P. Bealo offered that there had not been 480 people working on that site for a long time and it had no bearing on what works today.
B. Campbell said that it offered an historical perspective.
T. Campo suggested that if business prospered and there were large increases in the traffic numbers the Town may have to look at improvements to Route 121A
T. Moore explained that when new uses were proposed for the site there would have to be Planning Board review and such issues would be reviewed on a case-by-case basis.
L. Komornick asked what the washing down of vehicles would mean to the storm water management plan.
C. Zilch offered that would only be applicable if it was proposed to wash the vehicles outside, which was not the case.
P. Bealo reminded that, based on the note on the plan, states all Green Machine’s activities are conducted inside the building so they cannot wash down the vehicles outside.
Pam Burns, 167 Main Street, asked how many other vacancies there were in the building.
B. Campbell quoted the square footage designated as being for Testa on the site plan, including ancillary buildings and dry storage.
P. Burns reiterated the earlier concerns about Green Machine’s hours of operation and requested that they be restricted to fewer hours.
T. Moore offered that he wasn’t sure what would be gained by restricting the hours of Green Machine.
P. Burns replied that they (the board members) didn’t live on Main Street, where the only quiet day is Sunday.
T. Moore reiterated that when other tenants want to come on the site there would be a review of their type of business and things such as traffic and septic and other permitting needs would be looked at. He said that future tenants could be restricted based on the intensity of their proposed use. T. Moore offered that he didn’t see the need to restrict this business’s hours based on four (4) trucks a day.
P. Burns asked what happened if the business increased.
T. Moore replied that they could be asked to come back to the Board.
P. Burns asked if it was possible for the public to get copies of the plans.
T. Moore said that it was, through that Planning Office.
P Bealo added that anything given to the Board was considered public information.
T. Moore suggested that there was enough information to accept the plan as complete.
P. Bealo said that he did not think it was complete without the information on the evaporating machine.
T. Moore offered that all the technical site plan information was complete and it wasn’t the same as missing a deed or a property survey.
There was a discussion on what information is needed to consider an application as complete and allow the Board to take jurisdiction over a proposed plan, starting the time clock for action to be taken by the Planning Board.
S. Ranlett moved, second by B. Weymouth, to accept the plan for the Green Machine business at 144 Main Street as complete.
It was noted that the Board wanted to see the information on the evaporating machine.
There was no further discussion on the motion. The vote was 3-1-0 (Bealo dissenting).
B. Campbell noted there were a number of waivers that the Board would need to act on for this amended plan, but they were all the same as on the Testa plan.
T. Moore said the he didn’t see a reason to not grant the waivers that were previously granted for the Testa plan. He read the list of the waivers that were previously granted and were showing on this amended plan.
P. Bealo moved, second by S. Ranlett, to re-approve all the waivers shown on the amended site plan that were previously approved as part of the Testa plan. There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
There was a discussion as to what date to continue to for the public hearing on this application. There was also discussion on how to potentially address the issue of the spray booth and whether or not there was a way to make the obtaining of the proper permits a condition of approval.
B. Campbell reminded that they would have to obtain all the proper permits before operating the spray booth and that was outlined in “note #8” on the site plan.
T. Moore suggested that how to deal with the spray booth would have to be worked through.
L. Komornick suggested that the matter be continued to September 19, to be able to have enough time to clarify what was involved in obtaining an Air Resources permit.
J. Green asked if he would be able to occupy the building before the paint booth issue was resolved if he didn’t use the paint booth until the proper permits were in place.
L. Komornick offered that was why she was looking to find out what was involved in obtained the permit.
B. Campbell suggested that the Board had the note on the plan to rely on.
There was additional discussion regarding how best to proceed. It was suggested that the guidelines could be provided for the Air Resources permit if the meeting was continued to September 3.
S. Ranlett reminded that a CO could not be issued unless all proper permits were in place.
B. Campbell offered that Green Machine would like to begin to operate without the ability to paint. He acknowledged that they needed to get the information on the evaporating equipment and they would get a letter from NHDES regarding the spray booth.
L. Komornick asked if the spray booth was already on the site.
J. Green said that it was but that it was in another bay.
L. Komornick offered that she would be happy to work with B. Campbell regarding the Air Resources permit. She reminded that M. Dorman was looking for guidance regarding the pavement.
S. Cicatelli stated that they would set up another meeting with M. Dorman regarding the pavement.
B. Campbell suggested that if the condition of the pavement was an issue they would be happy to post a bond.
T. Moore stated that the public hearing on this matter was continued to September 3.
The Chairman called for a break at 8:33 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 8:49 p.m.
Discussion with Ron Charette re: use of property at 9 Main Street
Ron Charette, property owner of 9 Main Street, explained the history of the property located at 9 Main Street. He noted that there was currently a residential duplex on the property and a steel garage which he has only been able to use residentially. Mr. Charette reported that the zoning on the property had changed a number of times over the years and he wanted to know what he would be able to do on the property under its current zoning. He questioned if it would be possible to rent the duplex to someone who wanted to use the garage for business purposes and what would be involved in the process.
There was discussion regarding what would be allowed on the property. It was noted that it was outside the Village District and therefore a combined use would not be allowed. It was further noted that a home occupation did not allow for the business to be located outside the residential dwelling. The Board reviewed the tax maps too see how the property was situated and the buildings located. There was some discussion as to whether or not a combined use could be considered since it was not specifically prohibited in the zoning ordinances.
The Board suggested that Mr. Charette decide what kind of business he would like to see on the property and bring something a little more concrete back to the Board to see.
Next Agenda Item: It was noted that this plan had previously been accepted as complete and that all waiver requests had been approved.
P. Bealo moved, second by R. Gray, to approve the commercial site plan for 23 Atkinson Depot Road, as posted, with the following conditions:
-~~~~~~~Approval of NHDES Septic Permit
-~~~~~~~Favorable final review from CLD
L. Komornick noted that this was just an update item
Review of Request for Minor Site Plan for a Special Sales Event at Mountain Dogs for Specific Dates
L. Komornick explained that Mountain Dogs (5 Plaistow Road) was looking to have an annual tent sale.
The Board reviewed the application for the minor site plan review. There was discussion regarding granting the event for this year only and then reviewing to see if it worked out.
S. Ranlett moved, second by P. Bealo, to approve the minor site plan for this year’s tent sale for Mountain Dogs, the dates noted to be August 28, 2008, to September 2, 2008. There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
Request for Final Bond Release for Stateline Pet Store
T. Moore read a request from Dana Post regarding release of the bond being held for Stateline Pet, 137 Plaistow Road.
S. Ranlett moved, second by B. Weymouth, to release the balance of the bond account being held for 137 Plaistow Road (Stateline Pet).
L. Komornick noted they had done a great job on the site.
There was no discussion on the motion. The vote was 4-0-0 U/A.
Letter of Intent for Use of 1 Red Oak, Complex 2
T. Moore read a letter from Millennium Biotechnology, Inc., seeking to locate at a unit in Red Oak Business Condos. It was noted there would be 2-3 employees, Monday to Friday business hours, some manufacturing, materials delivered by FedEx, no 18-wheelers.
P. Bealo asked if it was an approved Integrated Commercial Residential (ICR) use.
T. Moore said that according to what is disclosed in the letter this was a permitted use.
Consensus of the Board that it would be okay for the business to locate as proposed.
P. Bealo suggested that if there were going to be chemicals used that there be confirmation that they are being properly stored.
It was noted that in conversations with Millennium Biotechnology, Inc., representatives it was reported that no hazardous chemicals are used in any of their processes.
Request for Payment from the Public Safety Complex Impact Fees Account
S. Ranlett questioned when impact fees began to be used to pay for letterhead and stationary.
L. Komornick explained that they were doing some filing systems updating based upon recommendations made by King Information Systems, which will reduce the amount of space the will be required for records storage. These costs were related to setting up the new system.
T. Moore added that without this filing it may be necessary to get another trailer.
S. Ranlett reiterated that he didn’t know it could be used for this purpose.
T. Moore replied that it was right on the cusp. He reminded that the police chief had come in to make a presentation to illustrate how this related to growth and therefore would allow for the use of Public Safety Impact Fees.
P. Bealo moved, second by T. Moore, that the use of public impact fees for this requested purpose is within the intent of the Public Safety Impact Fee Ordinance.
S. Ranlett said the he disagreed this was an appropriate use.
There was no additional discussion on the motion. The vote was 3-0-1 (Ranlett abstaining).
It was noted there were a number of FYIs in the packets.
T. Moore adjourned the meeting at 9:28 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted as recorded by Dee Voss.
Approved by the Planning Board on _________________________
________________________
Timothy Moore, Chairman
| 
