 |
MINUTES OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
MARCH 12, 2008
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Old Saybrook at its Regular Meeting that was held on Wednesday, March 12, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the Pasbeshauke Pavilion, 155 College Street Extension, heard and decided the following appeals:
Seated for this evenings meeting and voting were the following members: Dorothy Alexander, Vice Chairman, Julius Castagno, Chris Gosselin, Allan Fogg, alternate, Brian Dooley, alternate
Present: Christina Costa, Zoning Enforcement Officer, Kim Barrows, Clerk
Absent: Rex McCall, Chairman, Joan Strickland, Secretary, Wendy Farah, alternate
The meeting was then called to order at 7:32 p.m.
The following public hearings were conducted, as well as the decision session. The meeting has been recorded on tape and the following actions were taken:
The Vice Chairman introduced the Board members who were seated for this evenings meeting. The Vice Chairman then proceeded to read the Legal Notice into the record and outlined the order of the public hearing and the regular meeting.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARINGS:
07/08-29C– Raymond E. and Lori J. Hackling seek a variance of Par. 7.4.4 (narrow setback), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.3 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback 25 ft with narrow street setback/3' proposed), Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15 ft required/11.5' and 3' proposed), Par. 24.3.1A (minimum lot area) and Par. 24.3.2A (minimum dimension of square) of the Zoning Regulations to permit new construction of proposed 1 ½ story single family residence with attached wood deck on property located at 116 Sea Lane #2 (Indiantown), Map No. 13, Lot No. 78. New
home will comply with all requirements for the A6 (11') flood zone.
Present: William A. Childress, Esquire, agent for the applicant; Raymond Hackling, applicant.
Attorney Childress gave an overview of last month’s presentation. The applicants would like to rebuild their home on this lot and the home will comply with the flood plain ordinance and health code. The unique circumstance surrounding this property is that there is no naturally occurring soil to sustain an engineered septic system. If an engineered system cannot be built, there is a provision in the Health Code that allows a property owner to “repair” the existing system. After discussions with the neighbors, it was decided that the applicant was to increase the setback by an additional five feet by moving the house forward and re-positioning the deck. It was then that the Board decided to continue the public hearing so a plan could be submitted showing the exact revised location of the
house on the lot, which was done this evening. A letter from Ms. Alice Scibelli of 122 Sea Lane, dated March 11, 2008 was read into the record. Ms. Scibelli has no problem with the house being moved closer to her property line. The Board asked Attorney Childress about the hardship again and the hardship is that there is no ability to replace the septic system, the property is located in a flood plain and there are narrow street setbacks. This is the “classic” hardship wherein the land creates the hardship. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. Ms. Scibelli was present and she spoke in favor. In opposition were the Hinchcliffe’s who abut the property and the parties that agreed last month to the additional five feet. Tonight they were represented by Attorney Kenneth Slater of Halloran & Sage. Attorney Slater gave his presentation in opposition
stating that the applicants still had reasonable use of their land and did not have to build a house that size or have the deck they wanted, the applicants could scale it down. Attorney Slater produced pictures showing newly built houses towering over smaller, older cottages. Attorney Slater stated that the application should be denied for lack of hardship and he felt that the applicant was not willing to work with neighbors. Attorney Childress stated that as of last month, there was an understanding between the Board, the applicants and the neighbors regarding the placement of the house. Attorney Slater had contacted Attorney Childress today (3/12/08) regarding changing the plans. At this time, the parties asked for a short recess to discuss a resolution and the Board agreed. The recess ended and the parties agreed that the house structure will be moved farther to the south (farther than shown on the existing site development plan prepared
by Doane-Collins Engineering Associates, LLC dated March 4, 2008) which will provide a northerly setback of 11.5 foot and a setback of not less than 3.76 feet on the southerly border. In order to accomplish that the stairs to the deck would need to be reconfigured and be incorporated into the deck. The Board agreed that this was a good resolution. The house, as currently designed, is conservative in size as it is only 833 square feet. There was no further audience participation and no further Board comments at this time. The public hearing closed at 8:15 p.m.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
07/08-30 – Christine Meade seeks a variance of Par. 7.4.4 (narrow setback), Par. 10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback front 41.5'/9.70' exist/side 30.0'/9.79' existing), Par. 24.5.2 (setback/rear property line/15' required/2.97' existing) and Par. 24.6.2 (maximum bldg./structure
coverage) of the Zoning Regulations to permit removal of first floor wood deck on west and substitute same size uncovered deck on second floor; add second story living space above existing enclosed porch on east, there will be no new bedrooms added on property located at 32 Town Beach Road (Cornfield Point), Map No. 3, Lot No. 103.
Present: William Childress, Esquire, agent for the applicant; Ms. Christine Meade, applicant.
Attorney Childress gave a brief presentation. The house exists in its current location with two narrow street setbacks and the lot is only 42' wide. The applicants would like to remove the first floor deck and add a second floor deck. Above the existing screened in porch, the applicants would like to add a second story living space. The coverage remains the same since the applicant is not increasing the footprint. The hardship is the corner lot on a narrow street and the lot itself is narrow. This is the classic hardship. There has been health district approval and exceptional neighborhood support. The following letters were entered into the record in support: Roxanne Marie Quinn of 36 Town Beach Road dated March 5, 2007; Lena Bessoni of 25 Town Beach Road dated March 5, 2007; Janice Bojko of
3 Bellaire Drive dated March 5, 2007; Edward Bojor of 8 Bellaire Drive dated March 5, 2007; Margaret Abraham of 5 Bellaire Drive dated March 5, 2007; James and Claire Muller of 33 Town Beach Road dated March 5, 2007; Angelo Pepe, Trustee of 28 Mohican Road dated March 5, 2007 (all the letters have the same typo, they should state 2008). The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. There was no audience participation, but a Board member asked if the person who would abut the second story deck approved the plans, and yes, that would be Ms. Quinn. There were no further Board comments. The public hearing closed at 8:25 p.m.
07/08-31 C(a) – Appeal by Wells Bates, Jr. of the Zoning Enforcement Officers anticipated denial of a Certificate of Zoning Compliance for construction of a three bedroom, single family dwelling, garage and shed, together with associated septic system, driveway and terrace area, since the ZEO deemed that portions of the proposed project are located in the riparian buffer area as defined in the regulations on property located at 14, 16, 18 Fourth Avenue, Map No. 58, Lot Nos. 107, 108, 109.
Attorney Bennet stated that Mr. Bates is the contract purchaser of the property. Attorney Bennet gave his testimony regarding an interpretation of the measurement of 100' from the mean highwater line and the different terminology used in the regulations themselves. He stated that the surveyor, Dick Gates outlined on the map the 100' buffer. Lengthy discussion as to conflicting terms used in the zoning regulations and the Gateway Commission’s intent, along with its wording (language) with respect to what constitutes a riparian buffer. Christina Costa, the ZEO is taking the stricter interpretation since that was the CT River Gateway Commission’s original intent. The ZEO then outlined her reasons for determining the riparian buffer. C. Gosselin asked who prepared the map for the
applicant, it was Dick Gates, the Land Surveyor. C. Gosselin felt that since Mr. Gates was a professional that he was correct in mapping out the buffer lines and that the applicant should not be caught in the middle of conflicting terms. Discussion as to whether or not to support the Gateway’s decision. A letter dated March 12, 2008 from the Gateway was read into the record and is on file. The Board took a 5 minute recess to digest the information presented this evening. C. Gosselin felt that the applicant shouldn’t have to be caught in the mish mash the regulations created. J. Castagno agreed and the Gateway Regulations and the Zoning Regulations should have the same language. B. Dooley states that he will support the Gateway. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in
favor or in opposition. There was no audience participation and no further Board comments. The public hearing closed at 9:00 p.m.
A Motion was made by D. Alexander, seconded by J. Castagno to UPHOLD the DENIAL of the Certificate of Zoning Compliance by the ZEO regarding Application 07/08-31 C(a) – Appeal by Bates. The sentiments expressed in various definitions brought before the Board suggest a more conservative application of the rules in this case. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, B. Dooley Opposed: A. Fogg, C. Gosselin Abstaining: None The motion passed. 3-2-0
07/08-31 C(b) – Wells Bates, Jr. seeks a variance of Par. 58.2 (riparian buffer/100 ft. required/30' from tidal wetland proposed) of the Zoning Regulations to permit construction of a three bedroom, single family dwelling, garage and shed, together with associated septic system, driveway and terrace area on property located at 14, 16, 18 Fourth Avenue, Map No. 58, Lot Nos. 107, 108, 109.
Present: John Bennet, Esquire, agent for the applicant; Mr Bates, applicant.
Attorney Bennet gave a brief presentation. The applicant plans to build a 3 bedroom home on the Brockway property that had burned down and at one time was a boat yard. Applicants are going to remove the debris from the property, combine the lots and maintain the existing tree coverage in accordance with the Gateway standards. By doing that, they are requesting a variance from Par. 58.2, the riparian buffer since a portion of the property is within the 100'. If the applicants moved the house out of the 100' buffer, trees would be lost. The property is unique since it is bordered on two sides by water. The soil was tested and according to the Health District can have a new septic system on the property. There will be a house with a garage (2,700 s.f.) built on the property and a shed. The
hardship is the property is located at the end of the street on a larger lot but regulations were enacted after the creation of this lot. The project is in harmony with the immediate surrounding houses. The Gateway Commission in its letter dated March 12, 2008 did endorse the proposal in all respects. The following letters were read into the record in support: Deborah Prevost of 13 Fourth Avenue dated March 11, 2008; Barbara Jette of 15 Fourth Avenue dated March 11, 2008; George Catrambone and Martinella DeMarco of 12 Fourth Avenue dated March 10, 2008. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. Mr. Steve Shaney of 17 Fourth Avenue spoke in favor stating it would be a great improvement. Mr. George Catrambone of 12 Fourth Avenue also spoke in favor. There was no further audience
participation and no further Board comments. The public hearing closed at 9:25 p.m.
07/08-32 – Michael D. and Ellen Maus seek a variance of Par.10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback 30'/10.94' proposed) and Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15' required/N: 5.49 ft. +/-; S: 9.13 ft. +/- proposed) of the Zoning Regulations to permit removal of breezeway and garage
and to enlarge second floor of existing year-round 1.5 story dwelling (new septic to be installed) on property located at 11 Bayberry Road (Knollwood), Map No. 4, Lot No. 87.
Present: William A. Childress, Esquire, agent for the applicant; Mr. Michael Maus, applicant.
Attorney Childress gave a brief presentation. The lot is .14 acre with a one and a half story house with attached breezeway and garage. The existing coverage is 27.3% and the proposal is to remove the two structures in the rear of the property and reduce the coverage to 20.5%. The covered front porch is to be removed as well and the applicant would enlarge the front of the house. This is a narrow lot on a narrow street and the applicant is extending up from the existing footprint. The hardship is the 50' building area due to the size of the lot and the narrow street setback. The proposal is in harmony with the neighborhood. There is some neighborly concerns about views, but there are no view easements on the other properties. Pictures were handed out to show that by adding to the front of the
house, the views would not be impacted. There is a new septic that was designed by Tom Metcalfe and approved by the Health District that will be installed in the rear of the property. J. Castagno asked if the applicants were going to put up a garage to replace the one being removed. The applicant stated no. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. There was no audience participation in support of the application. I In opposition Attorney Ed Cassella spoke for Mr. And Mrs. Tannenbaum who also submitted a letter dated March 10, 2008 in objection. The Stones were also in attendance and they are opposed as well. Attorney Cassella gave his presentation in opposition stating that the addition to the front of the house will have an impact on the views. He went on to say that the street was designed with a certain “streetscape” in mind. They feel is was done on purpose in order to
afford everyone on the street a certain view of the water. Attorney Cassella also stated that the lot is deep and there is plenty of room in the rear to add on. The size of the lot is not unusual, since all of the beach lots are basically the same size and the amount of frontage is also not unusual. Attorney Cassella feels the applicant does not have a hardship. Ms. Tannenbaum spoke from the audience in opposition and stated that the neighborhood was designed in such a way so all could enjoy. Mr. Thomas Stone felt the applicants could expand the property to the rear. Mrs. Stone also spoke in opposition, she felt applicants could expand to the rear without infringing on the rest of the neighbors. Attorney Childress then spoke stating that the Stones were 5 or 6 houses back from the applicant’s and there would be no further encroachment on the footprint. He also reiterated that the zoning regulations themselves are a hardship for
the beach lots. There was no further audience participation and no further Board comments. The public hearing closed at 9:50 p.m.
07/08-33 – David Viggiano seeks a variance of Par. 7.4.10 (tidal wetland setback/50' required) of the Zoning Regulations to permit a 12' x 14' moveable shed that will contain a vegetable stand on property located at 1400 Boston Post Road (Atlantic Seafood), Map No. 027, Lot No. 21.
Present: Mr. David Viggiano, applicant.
Mr. Viggiano gave a brief presentation. He would like to move his 12' x 13' shed from its existing location across the street to the Atlantic Seafood lot. He is requesting a variance of the 50' wetlands setback since the shed will be placed 30' from the wetlands. There will not be bathroom facilities in conjunction with the operation of the vegetable stand. Mr. Viggiano has the support of the owners of Atlantic Seafood. There will not be a permanent foundation for the shed and it still can be moved. The stand will be open from approximately May to the end October and the applicant will seek a permit for signage. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. There was no audience participation and no further Board comments. The public hearing
closed at 10:00 p.m.
07/08-34– Jerzy S. and Stella Jedrychowski seek a variance of Par.10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15' required/N: 12.5 ft. +/-; S: 8.5 ft. +/- proposed) and Par. 24.6.2 (max bldg./structure coverage) of the Zoning Regulations to permit extension of deck by 2.5' increasing coverage to 21.3% on property located at 4 Toms Road (Great Hammock), Map No. 6, Lot No. 15.
Present: William Childress, Esquire, agent for the applicant; Dr. Jedrychowski and Eric Jedrychowski, the applicants.
Attorney Childress gave a brief presentation. This application is submitted to modify a previously granted variance in December of 2005. The only portion being modified is the deck itself. Originally the deck was 30'x8' with a set of stairs. The house has been build and supports and pillars are currently existing for the decking. The deck has not been built. There was discussion as to a “lip” on the pillar foundation which extends beyond the pillars which would make the deck 8'2"x30'9". The proposal is to transfer the extra square footage that was granted in 2005 to extend the decking and remove the stairs. The only access to the deck will be from the house. There were neighborhood complaints about extending the deck from 8' to 10' and a certain retaining wall. The retaining wall is being removed. The Vice Chairman then opened the floor to comments from the audience either in favor or in opposition. There was no audience participation in support of the application. In
opposition was Mr. Russell Settipane who owns 2, 3 Toms Road and 63 and 69 Plum Bank Road stated that there will be a loss of privacy with a larger deck and they have a beach easement that runs along the south side of the property. Theses matters have been brought up by him at the other hearings. Also Mr. McFarlin has felt that the views will be impacted if the deck is wider. There was no further audience participation and no further Board comments. The public hearing closed at 10:20 p.m.
REGULAR MEETING:
07/08-29C– Raymond E. and Lori J. Hackling seek a variance of Par. 7.4.4 (narrow setback), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.3 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback 25 ft with narrow street setback/3' proposed), Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15 ft required/11.5' and 3' proposed), Par. 24.3.1A (minimum lot area) and Par. 24.3.2A (minimum dimension of square) of the Zoning Regulations to permit new construction of proposed 1 ½ story single family residence with attached wood deck on property located at 116 Sea Lane #2 (Indiantown), Map No. 13, Lot No. 78. New
home will comply with all requirements for the A6 (11') flood zone.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. D. Alexander discussed the compromise reached this evening between the applicants and the abutting neighbors. The house structure will be moved farther to the south (farther than shown on the existing site development plan prepared by Doane-Collins Engineering Associates, LLC dated March 4, 2008) which will provide a northerly setback of 11.5 foot and a setback of not less than 3.76 feet on the southerly border. In order to accomplish that the stairs to the deck would need to be reconfigured and be incorporated into the deck. The Board agreed that this was a good resolution. The house, as currently designed, is conservative in size as it is only 833 square feet.
A Motion was made by C. Gosselin, seconded by D. Alexander to GRANT w/condition Application No. 07/08-29C - Hackling. The appeal is being granted in accordance with the compromise reached between the abutting neighbors and the applicants this evening. The appeal is in harmony with the neighborhood, and enhances safety with the 11 ft. floor elevation and it reduces the nonconformities with the setback from the property line. This variance does not substantially affect the comprehensive zoning plan and strict adherence with the zoning ordinance would cause unusual hardship in this particular case unnecessary for carrying out the general purpose of our zoning plan and this appeal is not in conflict with the purposes set forth in the Old Saybrook zoning regulations. The CAM is also approved. There is a condition that the applicant have an As-Built Survey (of the foundation placement) done by a licensed surveyor and that it be approved by the ZEO prior to the erection of the house
on the foundation. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
07/08-30 – Christine Meade seeks a variance of Par. 7.4.4 (narrow setback), Par. 10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback front 41.5'/9.70' exist/side 30.0'/9.79' existing), Par. 24.5.2 (setback/rear property line/15' required/2.97' existing) and Par. 24.6.2 (maximum bldg./structure
coverage) of the Zoning Regulations to permit removal of first floor wood deck on west and substitute same size uncovered deck on second floor; add second story living space above existing enclosed porch on east, there will be no new bedrooms added on property located at 32 Town Beach Road (Cornfield Point), Map No. 3, Lot No. 103.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. Applicants propose a second story deck and living space above existing enclosed porch. The proposal is straightforward and the neighbors are in favor of the proposal. The project is architecturally consistent with the neighborhood. The Board discussed coverage and existing setbacks and nothing is really changing in that respect.
A Motion was made by C. Gosselin, seconded by A. Fogg to GRANT Application No. 07/08-30 - Meade. The appeal is in harmony with the neighborhood and the applicant has done a good job with the additions blending with the architecture of the existing home. The hardship is the street setbacks. This variance does not substantially affect the comprehensive zoning plan and strict adherence with the zoning ordinance would cause unusual hardship in this particular case unnecessary for carrying out the purpose of our zoning plan and this appeal is not in conflict with the purposes set forth in the Old Saybrook zoning regulations. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None
The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
07/08-31 C(b) – Wells Bates, Jr. seeks a variance of Par. 58.2 (riparian buffer/100 ft. required/30' from tidal wetland proposed) of the Zoning Regulations to permit construction of a three bedroom, single family dwelling, garage and shed, together with associated septic system, driveway and terrace area on property located at 14, 16, 18 Fourth Avenue, Map No. 58, Lot Nos. 107, 108, 109.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. C. Gosselin stated that the applicant did an outstanding job with the design of this home. The Board agreed with him. Discussion regarding moving the house to the south and took into consideration the tree coverage the Gateway Commission wants to remain intact and the length of the driveway for maneuverability. The Gateway Commission endorsed the project in a letter dated March 12, 2008.
A Motion was made by A. Fogg, seconded by J. Castagno to GRANT No. 07/08-31 C (b) - Wells Bates, Jr. The hardship is with the tidal wetlands setback and placement of the house, as submitted, will comply with Conn. River Gateway Commission’s standards and no additional live trees will be removed with such placement. Three lots will be combined into one larger lot, a new septic installed, the property to cleaned up and debris removed. The proposal is consistent with the immediate abutting properties. The CAM is also approved. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
07/08-32 – Michael D. and Ellen Maus seek a variance of Par.10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.1 (street line setback 30'/10.94' proposed) and Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15' required/N: 5.49 ft. +/-; S: 9.13 ft. +/- proposed) of the Zoning Regulations to permit removal of breezeway and garage
and to enlarge second floor of existing year-round 1.5 story dwelling (new septic to be installed) on property located at 11 Bayberry Road (Knollwood), Map No. 4, Lot No. 87.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. The Board had lengthy discussion as to alternatives building in the rear versus building in the front close to the street. Discussion ensued re “streetscapes” and whether or not the street was developed so that each home could have a view of the water. It was stated that there are no rights to water views unless there are “view easements”. There are no view easements in this case. After discussion the Board took into consideration the depth of the lot and since the septic system is being replaced, the applicant could put an addition onto the house in the rear. After further discussion the Board could not find sufficient hardship to grant a variance for an addition in the front of the house and the consensus
was that an addition could be built on to the rear of the house.
A Motion was made by A. Fogg, seconded by C. Gosselin to DENY w/out Prejudice Application No. 07/08-32- Maus. Sufficient hardship has not been shown. Other alternatives are available for the expansion of the house. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
07/08-33 – David Viggiano seeks a variance of Par. 7.4.10 (tidal wetland setback/50' required) of the Zoning Regulations to permit a 12' x 14' moveable shed that will contain a vegetable stand on property located at 1400 Boston Post Road (Atlantic Seafood), Map No. 027, Lot No. 21.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. The Board felt that the size of the shed and that it is a permanent/temporary structure with seasonal use would not pose a threat to the wetlands which are approximately 30' away. Discussion re signage, applicant would have to pull permits for any signs on the building or property.
A Motion was made by C. Gosselin, seconded by J. Castagno to GRANT No. 07/08-33- Viggiano. The proposed vegetable shed is temporary in nature and a seasonal use on a temporary foundation. It does not impose any immediate threat to the wetlands that are 30 feet to the rear. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
07/08-34– Jerzy S. and Stella Jedrychowski seek a variance of Par.10.7.1 (nonconformity/ improvements/ enlargement), Par.10.8.2 (nonconformity/lots), Par.10.8.4 (nonconformity/lots), Par. 24.5.3 (setback/other property line /15' required/N: 12.5 ft. +/-; S: 8.5 ft. +/- proposed) and Par. 24.6.2 (max bldg./structure coverage) of the Zoning Regulations to permit extension of deck by 2.5' increasing coverage to 21.3% on property located at 4 Toms Road (Great Hammock), Map No. 6, Lot No. 15.
Discussion with respect to the public hearing that closed this evening. This application is a “modification” of a variance previously granted. The Board had the consensus that the deck not exceed ten (10') feet in width. The Board also discussed “diminished” views and if the stairs had remained, the view would be diminished even more. The modified plan is to remove the stairs previously granted and “swap” the coverage to increase the deck width by two feet so that the deck is 30' x 10'.
A Motion was made by A. Fogg, seconded by B. Dooley to GRANT No. 07/08-34- Jedrychowski. to modify the deck to be a total floor area of 30' x 10'. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: D. Alexander Abstaining: None The motion passed. 4-1-0
Minutes: A Motion was made by C. Gosselin, seconded by B. Dooley to approve the Minutes of the February 13, 2008 Regular Meeting with changes. Discussion: Re: Hackling, the word should be repair instead of rebuild the septic system. No further discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0
Adjournment: A Motion was made by B. Dooley, seconded by J. Castagno to adjourn the March 12, 2008 Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals. No discussion and a vote was taken: In favor: D. Alexander, J. Castagno, C. Gosselin, A. Fogg, B. Dooley Opposed: None Abstaining: None The motion passed unanimously. 5-0-0 The meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m.
The next Regular Meeting of the ZBA scheduled for Wednesday, April 9, 2008 at 7:30 p.m. at the Pasbeshauke Pavilion, 155 College Street Extension had been CANCELLED.
Respectfully submitted,
Kim N. Barrows, Clerk
Old Saybrook Zoning Board of Appeals
Old Saybrook, Connecticut 06475
| |
