NOTTINGHAM PLANNING BOARD MINUTES
OCTOBER 3, 2007
PUBLIC MEETING/HEARING
Approved 11/14/2007
PRESENT: ABSENT:
Mr. Dave Smith, Chair Ms. Gail Mills, Secretary
Mr. Peter Gylfphe, Vice Chair Mr. Mark Harding
Ms. Mary Bonser, Selectmen’s Rep. alternate
Mr. Bob Davidson
OTHERS PRESENT:
Mr. Richard Ladd, RSL Layout & Design
Mr. Vern Dingman, VW Dingman & Sons
Mr. Bill Netishen, Nottingham Selectmen
Mr. Scott Canney, Applicant
Ms. Pearl Cook, Applicant
Mr. James Tuttle, Applicant
Ms. Grace LaPointe, Applicant
Mr. Steve White, Applicant
Ms. Kristine Tuttle, Applicant
Mr. Rick Tuttle, Applicant
Ms. Cheryl Smith, Conservation Commission
Ms. Deb Stevens, Conservation Commission
Mr. Reed Murphy, Abutter
Ms. Michelle Beauchamp, Strafford Regional Planning Commission
Ms. Traci Chauvey, Secretary to the Planning Board
Chair Smith called the meeting to order at 7:05 PM.
MINUTES
Mr. Gylfphe made a motion to accept the minutes of the September 5 Planning Board Meeting, as written. Ms. Bonser stated she wanted more time to review them. Mr. Gylfphe withdrew his motion.
Mr. Gylfphe noted that he did not leave the meeting at 8:35 PM as recorded in the September 12, 2007 meeting minutes.
PUBLIC MEETINGS/HEARINGS
PUBLIC MEETING – SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (acceptance, compliance, and final approval of a 6-lot subdivision) – RSL LAYOUT & DESIGN FOR LITTLE RIVER REALTY TRUST, LUCILLE HOWARD – 375 STAGE ROAD – MAP 17 LOT 25 – CASE #P07-08-SUB.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 7:17 PM.
Ms. Beauchamp informed the Board that they should be looking at a plat with a revision date of September 19, 2007. Plats in file have a revision date of September 11, 2007. Mr. Ladd asked to be recessed to later in the evening to provide him with time to go to his office to retrieve updated copies for the Board.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to recess the meeting of joint cases #P07-08-SUB and #P07-09-SUB until 8:30 PM this evening. Mr. Gylfphe seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Chair Smith reopened the public meeting at 8:40 PM.
Mr. Ladd handed out new copies of the plat.
Strafford Regional Planning Commission’s Completeness Review #2: (See file).
There was confusion regarding which lot line the review referenced as being less than 60. The board member referenced in the same comment has resigned and was not able to indicate his concern. Chair Smith believed that the line Mr. Curry had been concerned with was on Lot _____. Mr. Ladd stated the angle of that line was 42. Chair Smith stated that the ordinance reads, “…shall be discouraged.” He felt the board would need to decide how they felt about it. No members sitting this evening had a problem with the lot lines.
Mr. Gylfphe asked if this development was going to create any run-off. Mr. Ladd informed Mr. Gylfphe that that is not allowed (by law), adding that water may not leave that property any faster than it currently does.
Chair Smith asked Mr. Ladd to change his term “uplands” on the plat to “buildable area”, which is required by the Subdivision Regulations.
Chair Smith stated that if the Town accepts the road, they would then accept responsibility for the detention pond as well; up until that time it is the responsibility of the developer or homeowners association.
Mr. Ladd stated that he has not yet provided copies of the language for the drainage easements, slope easements, or conservation easements.
Mr. Ladd stated that Lot 25-1 did not change in acreage when he changed the road entrance.
Mr. Gylfphe made a motion to accept the application of RSL Layout and Design for Little River Realty Trust, Lucille Howard, Trustee, 375 Stage Road, Map 17 Lot 25, Case #P07-08-SUB. Ms. Bonser seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Case was left open for discussion in the next case.
PUBLIC MEETING – SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (acceptance, compliance, and final approval of a 23-lot subdivision) – RSL LAYOUT & DESIGN FOR LEONARD GILES REVOCABLE TRUST OF 2000 – PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF GEBIG ROAD – MAP 17 LOT 31 – CASE #P07-09-SUB.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 7:17 PM. Recessed, see above. Chair Smith reopened meeting at 8:40 PM.
Strafford Regional Planning Commission’s Completeness Review #2: (Discussion began at 9:00 PM)
In reference to the lot line angles, Chair Smith stated that the line between proposed Lots 31-11 & 31-12 had two problems, noting that at the back it did not appear to be 60 and the front was substantially far from a 90 angle. Mr. Ladd stated that things have been reconfigured and this is the way the lot is shaped. He stated further stated that no one would ever see the shape of the lot unless they looked at the plat. He added that he would submit a waiver for the lot lines. Ms. Beauchamp suggested the Planning Board speak with the Conservation Commission before approving a waiver. Chair Smith stated that the Planning Board would determine if they have an acceptable plan and then, if they do, open the discussion for public comment. Chair Smith noted that there is problem also with the 60 angle between
proposed Lots 31 & 31-2 on Gebig Road, and the line between 31-2 & 31-1 on the proposed road, stating they would need waivers. Mr. Ladd stated he could make them conform.
Again, Mr. Ladd stated he would change his usage of the term “uplands” to “contiguous square feet.”
Ms. Beauchamp asked the Board to review the well for proposed Lot 31-10, pointing out that it was within the conservation corridor which is outside of the contiguous area. Chair Smith noted that a wetlands needed to be crossed to place it there. Mr. Ladd stated that there is a suitable buildable area and the well is within the buildable area. Chair Smith stated that he did not have a problem with where it was shown. Mr. Ladd added that the well will not be placed there but because of the regulations this is where he has to place it on the plat. Ms. Beauchamp asked if the Board was going to approve a lot that has its buildable area within a conservation easement. Mr. Ladd stated he would remove the conservation easement from that lot for the purpose of this subdivision. Ms. Bonser agreed that that
would be a good idea. She then inquired as to whether Mr. Ladd would need to have a wetlands crossing application for this lot. Mr. Ladd felt that he met the regulations with the 60,000 sq. ft. of contiguous area for a buildable lot with the uplands behind the wetlands, however, his intent was to build in the front. Chair Smith asked how much square footage was in front. Mr. Ladd did not have a ready answer. Chair Smith stated that the regulations require a 60,000 sq. ft. contiguous area. Mr. Ladd stated that he had shown a 60,000 sq. ft. contiguous area. Chair Smith informed him he would have to show access to it, as well, noting that the Board would need either a waiver request or a wetlands permit. After reviewing the plat more closely and reading the regulations, Chair Smith informed Mr. Ladd that the curb-cut does not need to go to the buildable area and since the lot was over five acres he did not need to show the septic and
could therefore move the well into the proposed buildable area. Ms. Bonser stated that there is the possibility of creating an unbuildable lot. She asked Mr. Ladd if he was confident that he could get the house, well, and septic in the front. Mr. Ladd responded that he was. Ms. Bonser asked if they would all meet the required setbacks of DES and town regulations. Mr. Ladd stated they would. Chair Smith stated that according to town regulations the septic could not be within 50’ of the property line. Ms. Bonser, responding to Chair Smith, stated she believed that the Board had voted to continue handling of this issue as they always had. Chair Smith stated that a vote was taken to follow the regulations as they are written and that is that the septic reserve area needs to be within the buildable area and 50’ from the property line(s). Chair Smith felt that the Planning Board should move on and come back to this
proposed Lot later.
Mr. Ladd stated that to his knowledge there are no easements across the property.
Mr. Ladd reported that well radiuses for proposed Lots 31-2, 31-11 and 31-18 have all been corrected to fall within the property lines.
Mr. Ladd stated that the 10’ setback line will remain on the plat for submission to DES.
Mr. Ladd reported that no draft easements had been submitted to the Planning Board at this time.
Mr. Ladd stated that there are a number of places they are considering placing the cistern should that be the fire department’s recommendation.
Mr. Ladd informed the Board that the abandoned well was a dug well and would be appropriately filled.
Chair Smith summed up, stating that Mr. Ladd needed to either correct the lot line angles or submit waivers and, also, copies of the easement documents for application acceptance.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to recess the applications of RSL Layout and Design for Little River Realty Trust, Lucille Howard, Trustee, 375 Stage Road, Map 17 Lot 25, Case #P07-08-SUB and of RSL Layout and Design for Leonard Giles Revocable Trust of 2000, Leonard Giles, Trustee, Property is located on the north side of Gebig Road, Map 17 Lot 31, Case #P07-09-SUB to October 10, 2007 at 7:15 PM. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Ms. Chauvey stated that an escrow needed to be set up for Little River Realty Trust since it had been accepted. Chair Smith stated there would be no third party reviews for Little River Realty Trust until Giles had been accepted.
PUBLIC MEETING – SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (acceptance, compliance, and final approval of a 2-lot subdivision) – COOK, PEARLE – 9 SMOKE STREET – MAP 24 LOT 1A – CASE #P07-10-SUB.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 7:25 PM.
Mr. Canney submitted a copy of a plat containing the required approval numbers and easements; however, they were written in red pen. Chair Smith informed Mr. Canney that this plat would not be adequate for acceptance.
Referring to SRPC’s review, Mr. Canney informed the Board that the angle being questioned is 90 degrees and that the issue of the buildable area had been addressed at the first meeting. Chair Smith stated that he was falling back on the Board’s history of interpreting the buildable area as being able to go to property lines and wetlands, noting that the buildings and septics within the buildable area need to meet the setback requirements. He felt the buildable area on this plat met those requirements.
The board asked Mr. Canney to have the curb-cuts put on the recordable plat.
Mr. Gylfphe made a motion to recess the public meeting of Pearle Cook, 9 Smoke Street, Map 24 Lot 1A, Case #P07-10-SUB until October 10th at 7:15 PM due to lack of updated plans. Ms. Bonser seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Chair Smith informed Mr. Canney that the Board would need four copies of the updated plan for the next meeting.
PUBLIC MEETING – HOME OCCUPATION APPLICATION – ANDERSON, CHARLENE – 54 GARLAND ROAD – MAP 15 LOT 1A-3 – CASE #P07-13-HO.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 7:43 PM.
Ms. Anderson stated she wanted to erect a sign for her approved home occupation. Ms. Bonser asked if she intended to hire a new employee. Ms. Anderson stated she did not.
Chair Smith informed Ms. Anderson that this was not something that could be approved tonight due to abutter and public notification. He stated that fees would need to be collected for these items. Mr. Gylfphe stated under site plan review, Ms. Anderson should bring in a perimeter survey. Ms. Anderson asked if she could bring a copy of the tax map. Mr. Gylfphe stated that a survey was preferable because the tax maps are not accurate. Chair Smith stated he did not feel this falls under site plan review. Mr. Gylfphe stated she would need to show where buildings are located.
At Mr. Gylfphe’s inquiry, Ms. Anderson stated that she does not have customers come to her house. Her only reason for being here is because she wants to put up a sign.
Chair Smith informed Ms. Anderson that she would need to pay her fees and be placed on the agenda for November 7th, noting that there was not enough time to notice the hearing prior to the next meeting.
Chair Smith informed Ms. Anderson to see Ms. Chauvey for assistance with the abutters list and payment of the fees.
PUBLIC MEETING – SUBDIVISION APPLICATION (acceptance, compliance, and final approval of a 2-lot subdivision) – LAPOINTE, GRACE – 131 RAYMOND ROAD – MAP 63 LOT 80-1 – CASE #P07-11-SUB.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 7:50 PM.
Mr. Dingman, in representation of Ms. LaPointe, handed out new copies of the plat. He stated that he had received a copy of SRPC’s completeness review and he was looking for feedback from the Board.
Chair Smith read for the record a letter from Attorney Teague which stated that based on minutes from a 1988 subdivision meeting, he believed that there was to be no more building on this road until it was brought up to town standards. (See file.) Mr. Dingman asked to receive a copy of the letter.
Chair Smith asked if there was anything on the plan showing the condition. Ms. Beauchamp replied that it was written on the plat. Ms. Bonser asked if 1988 was the last time there was a subdivision on Barderry. Ms. Beauchamp stated that she had only researched Lot 80. Mr. Gylfphe stated that subdivision had happened since then but it was done as a lot line adjustment, adding that the lot line that was moved to create Lot 80-1 had been previously abandoned. Chair Smith stated that that had no effect on the current case. Mr. White stated that the subdivision they were referring to was for his brother’s lot and the road which contains the condition is White’s Grove Road, not Barderry Lane. Ms. Chauvey retrieved the flat file copies of the plats being discussed. Mr. White stated that
this was a subdivision his grandmother had done and the condition noted on the plat is for White’s Grove Road. Mr. White inquired as to why the Planning Board did not receive the letter from their attorney earlier than today and also as to why the Planning Board’s attorney had not copied their attorney. Ms. Bonser apologized and stated that Attorney Teague was probably waiting for the ok from the Board to forward the letter to Ms. LaPointe’s attorney. She asked Chair Smith if he felt the meeting should be recessed until the two attorneys could appear. Mr. White asked if he could have his attorney contact the Planning Board’s attorney. Ms. Bonser felt that a vote should be taken on that. Ms. Beauchamp asked if the Board wanted to go through the completeness review. Ms. Bonser did not since it was not clear whether this could proceed. Mr. White once again stated that the condition on the plat was for
White’s Grove Road, adding that the Planning Board was about to pay their attorney to be told the same thing. Chair Smith stated that he felt if they were going to get the attorneys together, the Board should plan on doing it at a workshop instead of a regularly scheduled meeting. Ms. Chauvey stated that that would put them out to mid-November. Mr. White inquired again as to whether he could have his attorney contact the Planning Board’s attorney. Ms. LaPointe stated that they are trying to get this subdivision for her brother who is having difficulties since his wife has passed away from breast cancer. She stated that they have been to two Selectmen meetings, two Planning Board meetings, and a Zoning Board meeting. They have hired an attorney and have waited three months for a response from the Town’s attorney. She added that her brother waits for an answer after every meeting just to hear it is being delayed again.
Mr. White noted that the lot they want to subdivide conforms in every way to a buildable lot. Mr. Gylfphe stated that it is not a matter of the condition of the lot, adding that approving this could set a precedent. Mr. White stated that the Planning Board gets to review the merits of every case. Mr. White stated that there have been subdivisions on White’s Grove Road, Seaman’s Point Road, and all the private roads around the lake. He again informed Mr. Gylfphe that the note on the plat is for White’s Grove Road. He stated that he is frustrated at the amount of time this is taking, adding that it took eight months to get approval for Ms. LaPointe’s lot and they had to build in the winter. Ms. LaPointe stated that if they had been aware of Attorney Teague’s letter sooner, they could have brought it to their attorney and had this all resolved for this evening’s meeting. Chair Smith agreed and stated
he did not have a problem recessing the case to the following week if the attorney’s could straighten this out. Ms. Bonser confirmed with Mr. White that he would have his attorney contact Attorney Teague.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to recess the subdivision application of Grace LaPointe for acceptance, compliance review, and final approval of a 2-lot subdivision at 131 Raymond Road, Map 63 Lot 80-1, Case #P07-11-SUB until October 10, 2007 at 7:15 PM. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
PUBLIC MEETING – LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT APPLICATION (acceptance, compliance, and final approval) – TUTTLE, RICHARD AND KRISTINE, MAP 13 LOT 11-1 AND TUTTLE, JOHN & TUTTLE, JAMES, MAP 13 LOT 11 – PROPERTIES FRONT FREEMAN HALL ROAD & KENNARD ROAD – CASE #P07-12-LL.
Chair Smith opened the public meeting at 9:55 PM.
Ms. Tuttle stated that she and her husband were applying for this lot line adjustment so that they would have two acres to build on and still have 10 acres to keep in current use.
Ms. Chauvey informed the Planning Board that there was a problem with an abutter notification; it was returned to the town with the word “deceased” written on it. Ms. Beauchamp stated that if no deed has been transferred, there is no one to notify. She asked Ms. Chauvey to check with the Rockingham County Registry of Deeds.
Strafford Regional Planning Commission’s Completeness Review #1: (See file.)
In regards to the buildable area, Ms. Beauchamp noted that the funnel-down had been corrected and square footage/acreage was now shown.
The Tuttle’s submitted a waiver for an Impact Statement. Chair Smith read the waiver for the record.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to accept the waiver for an Impact Statement. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
The Tuttle’s submitted a waiver for the scale of the plat. Chair Smith read the waiver for the record.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to accept the waiver for the plat scale. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
The Tuttle’s submitted a waiver for seal and signature of a Wetlands Scientist. Chair Smith read the waiver for the record.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to accept the waiver for the seal and signature of the Wetlands Scientist with the condition that a note be placed on the plat referencing the original subdivision plat that contains the seal and signature. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
The Tuttle’s submitted a waiver for the contours of plat. Chair Smith read the waiver for the record.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to accept the waiver for the contours with the condition that a note be placed on the plat referencing the original subvision plat that contains the contours. Mr. Davidsion seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Chair Smith stated that because the parcel is over five acres, the applicant was not required to show the 4K area.
Ms. Tuttle reported that they had an approved driveway permit from the original subdivision and that the driveway is in. Ms. Beauchamp asked to verify the location of the driveway. They viewed the plat from the original subdivision and Ms. Beauchamp noted that the driveway is in a different location. Mr. Tuttle stated that the wetlands were in the way for the originally proposed driveway. Noting that the approved subdivision plat did not indicate that the wetlands were in the way, Chair Smith inquired about the difference between the two plats asking if the wetlands grew or if the original plat represented them improperly. Chair Smith asked if the applicants received a new permit for the current driveway location. The applicants stated they had approved applications for both.
Mr. Gylfphe informed the other members of the board that Note 3 already referenced the original subdivision plat.
Chair Smith noted that the plan identification block had been corrected, as well as Note e #4.
Ms. Beauchamp stated that Note #7 should be taken out, since it was a note from the original subdivision and references monuments “to be set” that are already set. Chair Smith stated that if there was just a reference to the Book and Page, he would not know what it was actually referencing.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to accept the lot line adjustment application made by and between Tuttle, Richard and Kristine (Tax Map 13 Lot 11-1) and Tuttle, James, and Tuttle, John (Tax Map 13 Lot 11) for properties that front Freeman Hall Road & Kennard Road, Case #P07-12-LL. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Ms. Bonser made a motion to recess the compliance review and final approval of a lot line adjustment application made by and between Tuttle, Richard and Kristine (Tax Map 13 Lot 11-1) and Tuttle, James, and Tuttle, John (Tax Map 13 Lot 11) for properties that front Freeman Hall Road & Kennard Road, Case #P07-12-LL until October 10, 2007 at 7:15 PM. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
OTHER BUSINESS:
Ms. Beauchamp informed the board that the handout entitled Transportation Access Management Policies was the copy of the Memorandum of Understanding which they had asked for.
Ms. Chauvey informed the board that the Town accepts cisterns that are not part of road development by easement deeds. She stated that there is a copy of an easement deed in the Lake Realty Trust (Jalbert) file; however, there is not an original and it has not been recorded. She asked the board how they wanted to move forward with this since the proper inspections had not been completed and the fire department would not certify the installation. Chair Smith inquired as to whether the applicant had received a checklist. Ms. Chauvey stated that he had said he did not and she could not confirm when the checklist was established; however, his design stated which inspections needed to take place. She read the pertinent notes from the Cistern Specification plat. Ms. Chauvey stated that she believed the fire
department had been contacted at the point that the cistern was in and already strapped to the deadmen. Ms. Bonser stated that the developer should be required to dig it up and reinstall it if he did not follow the proper procedure. Ms. Chauvey stated she did not think it was that simple. She stated that she had contacted Mr. Jalbert, per a previous request from the Board, to find out if Mr. Jalbert had had an engineer inspect the installation and to obtain any records of inspection that that engineer had available. Mr. Jalbert informed her that he did not have an engineer inspect the installation. She further added that he had become angry and informed her that he had been given the ok to continue installation from the fire chief. Ms. Chauvey added that she believed there is a record of this and was not sure what recourse the board had since Mr. Jalbert was told to continue by the representative of the Town who oversees this area. Ms.
Beauchamp asked why the fire department would not certify the installation. Ms. Chauvey stated that, according to their letter, compaction was not witnessed at any stage of the installation. She added that they have record of going out to the site several times but did not, at any point, see the developer compact the materials. Ms. Beauchamp asked if this was something the Board of Selectmen should handle. Ms. Chauvey stated that she had spoken with the Town Administrator who felt that the Planning Board would need to decide how to handle the issue. Ms. Bonser stated that the situation had not been handled well up to this point. Ms. Beauchamp stated that, as a developer, Mr. Jalbert should have asked Chief Vilchock to write a letter stating that it was ok for him to continue with the installation when he realized there was any kind of a problem. Ms. Bonser stated she did not feel it needed to be in writing. Mr. Gylfphe stated that he
believed the Planning Board had done their part, that the information was on the plan and that the developer did not follow the requirements. Chair Smith felt this was an enforcement issue and should not be before the Planning Board. Ms. Beauchamp stated that the developer will need to step forward and resolve the issue with the Town to receive certificates of occupancy, at some point. Ms. Chauvey stated that there is still the issue of the easement deed, which falls under the Planning Board. Ms. Beauchamp asked why the cistern was not bonded. Ms. Bonser explained that they do not issue certificates of occupancy until it is done and they consider that process their “bond.” Ms. Beauchamp stated that she felt the Town should bond cisterns because their process allowed for the developer to sell the lots and leave the land owners in a bind when they come in to get their building permits. Ms. Chauvey stated that Mr. Colby, Nottingham
Building Inspector, had told her it was common practice in all other towns he has worked in for the Planning Board to request a five-year bond on cisterns. She further informed the board that there, also, is no easement deed for the Fernald cistern on Raymond Road (Rte. 156). Ms. Bonser felt that a letter should be sent to the Fernald’s regarding the cistern on Raymond Road and that Chair Smith should speak to Attorney Teague regarding the cistern on Deerfield Road. Ms. Bonser left the meeting.
Ms. Chauvey informed Chair Smith that she had pulled the minutes for Mr. Longueil’s preliminary hearings, as he had asked. She informed the other members of the board that Mr. Longueil had called her on a couple of occasions now and was requesting a joint meeting between the Planning and Zoning Boards. Chair Smith reminded everyone present that this is the lot which Mr. Longueil was proposing to subdivide into three with two curb cuts off of North River Lake Road (one in Nottingham, the other in Northwood), and the third proposed access was through a shared driveway with an existing Northwood residence. Chair Smith stated he would like Mr. Longueil to come in front of the Planning Board one more time before setting up a joint meeting just to get caught up on where things stood. Ms. Chauvey stated she would
contact Mr. Longueil to ask if he would come before the Planning Board one more time.
Mr. Davidson stated he felt the Planning Board needed to put some effort into finding Alternates.
Ms. Chauvey asked Ms. Beauchamp to clarify the Lot Envelope for her, one more time. Ms. Beauchamp stated that the Lot Envelope will be able to go to the property line and the wetlands.
Ms. Chauvey informed the Planning Board that the Town of Nottingham has made a donation to the Seacoast Cancer Center in the name of Jim Goodwin, Sandra Jones’ husband.
Ms. Chauvey reported that RCCD has completed the report for Sophia Way and it is in the mail. She read for the record the cover letter which was faxed to the office earlier today.
Mr. Gylfphe made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Davidson seconded the motion. All in favor. Motion passed 4-0.
Meeting adjourned at 11:20 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Traci Chauvey
Planning Board Secretary
| 
