Mashpee Planning Board
Minutes of Meeting
February 5, 2014 at 7:00 p.m.
Waquoit Meeting Room, Mashpee Town Hall
Approved 4-0 on 2/19/14
Planning Board Members Present: Chairman George Petersen, Mary Waygan, Dennis Balzarini, David Kooharian, Joe Cummings
Also Present: Tom Fudala-Town Planner, Charles Rowley-Consultant Engineer, Selectman Tom O’Hara
Absent: Joe Mullin
CALL TO ORDER
The Town of Mashpee Planning Board meeting was opened with a quorum in the Waquoit Meeting Room at Mashpee Town Hall by Chairman Petersen at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, February 5, 2014 and the Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
APPROVAL-NOT-REQUIRED PLAN
Applicant: Christopher & Colin Dangel
Location: 760 Cotuit Road, corner of Pimlico Pond Road, Mashpee Assessors Maps as Map 3, Block 10
Request: Signature of 2-lot ANR Plan
Mr. Rowley reviewed the plan and confirmed that it met the requirements of an Approval-Not-Required Plan. Charlene Anthem, of Cape & Islands Engineering, represented the applicant. Members of the Board reviewed the plans. It was noted that it was a 2-lot plan on the corner of Pimlico Pond & Cotuit Road meeting lot and financial requirements. There were no additional comments.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion that approval was not required for the plan as recommended. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
Chairman Petersen signed the plan.
PUBLIC HEARING
7:10 Applicant: BCDM, LLC
Location: On and between Blue Castle Drive and Degrass Road, identified on the Mashpee Assessors Maps as Map 104, Blocks 14, 20 and 48
Request: Approval of a Special Permit for a 16 lot cluster subdivision
7:10 Applicant: BCDM, LLC
Location: On and between Blue Castle Drive and Degrass Road, identified on the Mashpee Assessors Maps as Map 104, Blocks 14, 20 and 48
Request: Approve 16 lot cluster subdivision Definitive Subdivision Plan
The appointed time having arrived, Chairman Petersen opened both public hearings and read for the record the applicant’s request. Matt Costa of Costa Associates represented the applicant in the now 15-lot subdivision. Since previously considered, the applicant completed a technical round of revisions with Mr. Rowley resulting in the elimination of prior waiver requests, requiring just one waiver regarding sidewalks, completion of the Design Review process, completion of abutter outreach to include a revised covenant and abutter participation, road maintenance and lawn standards. The adopted lawn standards were a result of the water quality report and Mr. Costa noted that they were adopted from the Mashpee Conservation Commission regulations and included a reduced lawn area to help mitigate the nitrogen
load of the project. Consultant Gary James was also available for questions regarding the water quality report. Mr. Costa noted that a nitrogen aggregation loading plan would also be completed due to the development’s location in Zone 2, but that the subdivision plan would first need to be approved.
Attorney Brian Wall, representing the applicant, referenced abutters’ concerns regarding the Blue Castle road pavement necessary in order to establish frontage for the development and their preference that the entire length to Great Neck Road South be paved. The developer’s position was that pavement of the entire road was not reasonable for the project as access was not necessary and costly at approximately $450,000. The developer has offered to grade the road on a one-time basis as part of the project, to fix the potholes and to attempt to address water run-off issues with a crown in the road. Mr. Wall reached out to the abutters by letter to property owners on Blue Castle Drive regarding the project and plans for the road. The September 26th letter described the project as
well as requested a response to questions, such as whether property owners would be willing to contribute an equitable share to improve the road or become members of an association. Mr. Wall reported that he sent 16 letters and received 2 responses, 1 letter with favorable responses and a lengthy voice mail containing negative responses. As a result, Mr. Wall proposed covenants to be recorded, adding that the association would annually be required to grade Blue Castle Drive from the end of the pavement to Great Neck Road South and to fill in pot holes and apply gravel as needed. Additionally, property owners in the development would automatically become members of the association and subject to assessments, but new members from Blue Castle Drive willing to pay their fair share of road maintenance may also be admitted to the association. Mr. Wall also pointed out that lawn limitations, no more than 2,500 square feet, were added to the covenants and that all
lawn maintenance would be subject to the lawn standards set by the Conservation Commission. Mr. Balzarini commended Mr. Wall on his efforts to reach out to the abutters. Mr. Balzarini inquired whether laying out the street would be in its existing location or the proper layout and Mr. Fudala responded that the Planning Board would have to approve any construction being completed to the street. Mr. Balzarini pointed out that property laying out the road would likely result in property owners losing l0-50 feet of what they may perceive as their property. Mr. Fudala referenced the lawn standards in #15, noting that the 3.5” grass length requirement was counter to the preferred 4” length ideal for a low maintenance lawn. Mr. Wall indicated that it could be amended. Mr. Fudala also recommended reconsidering lawn irrigation and Mr. Wall stated that irrigation would be removed as a requirement in #10 of the covenants. The special covenant
additions were located on page 5 and found in #23, #25 and #26. Chairman Petersen inquired about the annual assessment should Blue Castle property owners wish to join the association and Mr. Wall indicated that typically association membership was approximately $500-$600 per year for road maintenance, insurance requirements and capital reserve. Mr. Wall would expect that it would be reduced for economy by scale. Mr. Fudala inquired whether residents outside of the paved area would have to contribute to road costs and there was suggestion that levels be established so that Blue Castle property owners who became members of the association contributed to road maintenance and insurance costs. Mr. Wall indicated that the issue could be addressed and negotiated should the abutters wish to discuss the matter. Mr. Fudala suggested that a low cost membership may attract more existing property owners. Mr. Costa pointed out that the association would be
responsible only for the gravel road extending from the paved area to Great Neck Road South and not the end. Association membership may allow maintenance for all of Blue Castle.
The appointed time having arrived for the 7:30 Public Hearings for National Development, the Chair read the applicant’s requests for the record.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to 7:50 p.m. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
Returning to the Ockway Highlands matter, Mr. Balzarini inquired about the necessary insurance and Mr. Wall confirmed that it would be in case of injury as well as association fiduciary coverage. There was also confirmation that it would be added to the deed. Mr. Wall indicated that a 2nd class membership could be created allowing Blue Castle members to pay their proportionate share for road maintenance and insurance, but not the capital reserve for the road.
Ms. Waygan inquired about the impacts of the water quality report to which Mr. Costa responded that it resulted in reducing the lawn areas and adoption of the lawn standards into the covenant. Ms. Waygan also inquired about the affordable lot and how the requirement would be met. Mr. Costa indicated that the lot would be donated to a non-profit developer of affordable housing. The Chair inquired whether the affordable housing lot would also be subject to the association membership and Mr. Costa suggested it would unless it was in violation of town regulations. Ms. Waygan indicated that fees would likely be reduced in an effort to maintain the affordability of the lot, possibly through pro-rating. Mr. Fudala inquired about the required size of the home and the type of home
typically built by Habitat for Humanity and Mr. Costa indicated that the association could waive the requirement for the lot but that the covenants require a 1,500 footprint which likely could be met for an affordable home. Ms. Waygan suggested a condition for the affordable unit parcel and Mr. Fudala indicated that it could be written into the Special Permit decision.
Ms. Waygan inquired whether permission would be needed from existing Blue Castle Drive owners for improvements to the gravel road and Mr. Wall responded that permission was not needed as the development had lots with frontage on the road. Pavement of the road would be another issue. There was further discussion regarding the layout of the road and the need to properly align the roadway should the road be paved, grading or graveling the road would allow it to stay within its existing location. Mr. Fudala referenced the letter abutter Hugh Barnes sent to Mr. Wall regarding concerns about road runoff flooding his front yard. Mr. Costa stated that the regrading should pitch the runoff to another vegetated area to remedy the issue.
Chairman Petersen referenced 8 Blue Castles’ property being the entrance to Blue Castle Road and the issue of access but Mr. Wall indicated that the development’s frontage on Blue Castle would allow the right of way. Additionally, the road was more than 20 years old, rights had been established by prescription, or the properties could be accessed by the legal layout. Mr. Fudala confirmed that the Planning Board would be requesting that the existing road be maintained and the Planning Board was not tasked with making a legal rights decision. Mr. Wall added that the applicant’s proposal showed frontage on ways, completed without Blue Castle because it was not a necessary means of access, and that the proposal to grade Blue Castle was an effort to be a good neighbor. Mr. Wall also noted that the
Planning Board would not be approving the increased traffic to the roads but approving the ways laid out on the plan, with the grading as an add-on.
At 8 p.m., the Chair opened the public hearing for Cotuit Solar and read for the record the applicant’s request.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to 8:40 p.m. Ms. Waygan seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
The Chair opened the National Development public hearings.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to 8:50 p.m. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
Mr. Fudala referenced a list of issues and provided a summary to include:
-Board of Health approved the proposed drainage but required a nitrogen aggregation agreement
-Plan Review requested the pavement of the entire length of the road
-Degrass Road residents requested a 4-way STOP at Degrass and Tracey as well as Gia Lane to slow traffic, which would require approval from the Board of Selectmen. Mr. Fudala indicated that the Planning Board could add a condition that the applicant fund the cost of the signs should the residents petition the Board of Selectmen for the additional signage
-The request for a speed sign was investigated and determined too costly at $5,000
-The water quality report showed a nitrogen increase of 5.2% (186 lbs. per year) to Ockway Bay and a suitable solution was needed to mitigate the increase. There was discussion regarding the effectiveness of de-nitrifying systems and the possibility that a cluster system with Nitrex may result in lower nitrogen numbers. There was also question whether nitrogen would be sufficiently mitigated with the lawn reduction and lawn standard requirements. Mr. Costa stated that the lawn reduction, along with adding the conservation standards, such as limiting fertilizer usage, provided the mitigation. Mr. Costa further discussed Zone 2 and the nitrogen load being suitable and sustainable, bridging the gap until a municipal sewer system was in place. Mr.
Costa felt that a cluster system would not be economically feasible for this project. Mr. Fudala pointed out that Ockway Bay was overloaded and the need for 100% of septic nitrogen to be removed in order to meet the TMDLs.
The Chair invited the public to comment. Erik Lebrano, Blue Castle Drive, inquired whether a study had been completed to assess the traffic generated on Degrass due to the addition of 50+ cars. Mr. Lebrano also suggested that the proposed development was not family friendly to the existing neighborhood and suggested that Blue Castle should be paved and located in the legal layout. Mr. Lebrano noted that paving in front of the proposed Blue Castle lots to establish frontage would also result in the pavement of 8-10 feet of Mr. Lebrano’s property. Mr. Lebrano felt that the issues required additional consideration. Chairman Petersen stated that some development on the property would occur at some point and inquired about Mr. Lebrano’s opinion regarding what should be developed at the
location. Mr. Lebrano responded that he liked the development plans but not the plans to pave only one portion of the road and expressed concerns about the lip created and the fact that the road would not be straight. Mr. Costa stated that the existing gravel way was on Mr. Lebrano’s property and that the pavement will be placed in the proper layout of the road, connecting to the gravel and graded to match for a smooth transition. Mr. Lebrano expressed concern that the pavement would break down and Mr. Costa confirmed that the pavement and gravel would be maintained to Great Neck Road South.
Linda Lebelzac, of Tracy and Degrass Road, expressed her concern regarding the traffic on the small town road, and indicated that she would be petitioning the Town for STOP signs. Ms. Lebelzac also expressed concern about the increased traffic from trucks while constructing the development and suggested that trucks access the area by way of Great Neck Road and Blue Castle. Mr. Balzarini will look into the issue. Ms. Lebelzac expressed concern about the area being used as a cut-through, noting that both her son and dog had been hit by cars in the past.
Wayne Reid, of Blue Castle, expressed his opinion that the road be maintained with the whole length being paved by the developer and not just a small portion. Mr. Reid stated that there was a building moratorium until the road was properly paved. Mr. Reid described the challenges of maintaining the gravel road and felt that the developer should fund the cost of paving the road since the majority of the houses would be on that road. Mr. Balzarini inquired whether the residents wished to contribute to paving the road and Mr. Reid responded that a proposal could be considered although the neighbors felt that it should be the responsibility of the developer. Ms. Waygan inquired whether Mr. Reid had received a letter from Mr. Wall and Mr. Reid responded that he felt that the questions posed did not
justify a response because he felt there was no need for an association. Ms. Waygan recommended that Mr. Reid respond to the questionnaire or letter. Mr. Reid felt that his concerns could be addressed at the meeting with the project proponents rather than by letter.
Joy Dorsey, of Blue Castle, stated that she did not oppose the development of the land but pointed out that she purchased her home because of the existing neighborhood featuring an old Cape Cod style and expressed concern that the new housing would spoil the feel of the road. Ms. Dorsey’s home will be adjacent to six of the new homes. Ms. Dorsey also expressed concern regarding the challenges of plowing a partially paved roadway. Ms. Dorsey felt that 1-acre zoning should remain for the area. The Chair responded that cluster developments were an effort to save open space. Ms. Dorsey felt that their open space would become a crowded neighborhood. Ms. Dorsey inquired about accessibility and plowing issues for the new development and ensuring that the road was accessible for anyone with
medical issues. The Chair confirmed that the paved area would qualify for Town plowing.
Mr. Rowley’s comments involved questions for Mr. Wall as well as the grading of Blue Castle. Further discussion will take place at the next meeting. Mr. Rowley will draft a memo with more details. Mr. Fudala inquired about ownership for the open space and Mr. Costa responded that it would remain with the association. Mr. Fudala recommended that Board members email suggested conditions for the decision.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue both Public Hearings to 7:10 p.m. on February 19th . Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
The Chair opened the public hearing for Cotuit Solar.
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to continue the Federal National Mortgage Association Public Hearing to 9:20 p.m. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
7:30 Applicant: National Development
Location: Corner of Route 151 and Old Barnstable Road, Map 66, Lot 107 and Map 73, Lots 30, 31, 46 and 47
Request: Approval of a Special Permit for a 54 unit assisted living facility
7:30 Applicant: National Development
Location: Corner of Route 151 and Old Barnstable Road, Map 66, Lot 107 and Map 73, Lots 30, 31, 46 and 47
Request: Approval of Definitive Subdivision Modification eliminating 5 lots and “Brynwood Way”
Chairman Petersen opened the public hearing for National Development and read for the record the applicant’s request. Ted Tye of National Development was present to discuss the request. Mr. Tye summarized that National Development had been in business for 30 years with 23 senior housing projects in Massachusetts. Mr. Tye indicated that National Development very carefully considered the market and need for this type of assisted living service and found the areas to be underserved with increasing demand. National Development is proposing an assisted living community specializing in memory care, in partnership with Epoch of Waltham. The facility will be located on a 24-acre site of undeveloped land, developing only 5 acres with the remaining 19 to be preserved with a conservation easement. Development will be away from any sensitive areas of the site and a Massachusetts historical survey completed as well as work with Natural Heritage. The structure will be a one story, 54
unit/60 bed facility. National Development has been through Mashpee Design/Plan Review and has consulted with the Mashpee Fire Department, all leading to a review by the Cape Cod Commission. Mr. Tye emphasized the company’s effort to make low impact use of the property including landscaping, wastewater treatment and development of a LEEDS certifiable building.
Mr. Tye stated that there had been extensive discussion regarding the location of the facility’s single driveway, including feedback from Southport and conversation with the Cape Cod Commission and it was determined that the safest and best access would be aligning the driveway with the Southport egress. The facility would generate very limited traffic, 8 trips during the morning peak hours and 24 trips during the peak afternoon hours. Designed to look like a house, the building will feature three household wings and will be screened from the surrounding area with landscaping and a tree buffer. There will also be outdoor access with a variety of courtyards. Mr. Tye pointed out the locations of wastewater treatment fields and fire lane. Regarding parking, National Development will be seeking a
parking waiver as Mashpee bylaw would require a larger number of parking spaces than would be needed as residents would not have cars. The facility requires 50 spaces and 54 have been proposed, which has been supported by the Cape Cod Commission particularly as it would reduce impervious surfaces.
Mr. Tye summarized the Cape Cod Commission findings located on page 17 of the Cape Cod Commission’s decision. Included within the findings it was noted that 10% of the 60 beds would be set aside as affordable, unique to Massachusetts, and 19 acres would have a permanent open space conservation restriction. Additionally, $108,000 has been set aside to the Cape Cod Commission for traffic mitigation and $22,500 will be given to the Mashpee Historical Commission. Mr. Tye also pointed out the benefits outweighing the detriments list. Regarding Mr. Rowley’s review of the proposal and his letter, the applicant had no disagreements and expressed a willingness to comply and provided a list of clarifications to Planning Board members. Regarding the subdivision, the road and individual lots would no
longer be necessary and the proposed plan would wipe out the lines, maintaining only the perimeter line.
Mr. Balzarini inquired about the mitigation funds collected by the Cape Cod Commission. Mr. Tye responded that $22,500 would be provided to the Mashpee Historical Commission and the $108,000 traffic payment would be held by the Cape Cod Commission on behalf of Mashpee. Eliza Cox, attorney representing the applicant, clarified that the funds would be paid to the County and assessed in a fund until the Town petitions for the funds to be utilized for a specific traffic project with no specific deadline. Mr. Tye added that there was a fair share contribution of $23,291 for nitrogen impacts to the embayment also available to Mashpee.
Ms. Waygan inquired about the bio-retention systems. Mr. Rowley responded that the basis of the drainage system design was appropriate but some information needed to be upgraded in order to complete a final review of the drainage calculations. Concern was expressed regarding roof runoff into infiltration trenches lining the buildings, which was prohibited by bylaw. Mr. Tye planned to have their engineers meet with Mr. Rowley prior to the next meeting. Ms. Waygan also expressed concern about the entranceway and ensuring the line of sight. Mr. Tye indicated that there was unanimous consent to locate the entrance at its proposed location. Mr. Rowley suggested there was need for a plan showing the striping and Mr. Tye responded that it would be forwarded. Mr. Rowley also recommended
reviewing the signage. Mr. Rowley suggested rescinding the old subdivision in a public hearing to remove the street and lot lines, rather than modify an existing subdivision. Following the appeal period, the plan could be used for ANR.
Comment was invited from the public. Bill Telly inquired about a stop light and Mr. Tye responded that the traffic count did not warrant a traffic light at that site. Mr. Tye suggested the possibility of a yellow flashing light in the future should Southport grow.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to February 19 at 7:45 p.m. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
A recess was taken at 9:25 p.m. and the meeting re-opened at 9:32 p.m.
7:45 Applicant: Federal National Mortgage Association c/o Cotuit Solar LLC
Location: 36 Savanna’s Path / Trinity Place
Request: Approval of 1-lot definitive subdivision plan and road designs
Chairman Petersen opened the public hearing and read the request for the record. Michael Coyne, representing the applicant, indicated that a meeting had taken place to discuss Mr. Rowley’s list related to his review of the proposal. Mr. Coyne indicated that an effort was being made to keep the easements small, but that they had redesigned the drainage areas. Mr. Rowley was still awaiting the hydrocad calculations in order to review the drainage. Mr. Coyne stated their hope to move forward, adding that 25 items had been eliminated from the list. New plans were distributed to members of the Board.
Mr. Rowley stated that the plans were in good shape and that the easements were modified as discussed. Mr. Rowley inquired about the road name as there were two road names listed. Mr. Fudala stated that Trinity Place would be located at the intersection with Simons Road and Savanna’s Path was located off of Sampson Mills Road. There was discussion regarding the gated area and labeling the plan. It was determined that the address would be Trinity Place. Mr. Rowley recommended a condition that no construction details had been approved for Savanna’s Path, in case of a future ANR plan.
Mr. Rowley stated that most issues had been addressed from the subdivision plan and construction details and he indicated that he would review the calculations for stormwater right away. Ms. Waygan indicated that prior to a vote, she wished to first see the solid line between the roads, the condition that no construction had been approved for Savanna’s Path and the gate between the two roads shown on the plan. Mr. Fudala added that he would like to see a continuance while awaiting the final details and a covenant.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to continue the Public Hearing to February 19 at 7:05 p.m. Ms. Waygan seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES—January 15, 2014
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to approve the minutes of January 15 as presented. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
BOARD ITEMS
New Business
Street Naming-The Chair referenced the street naming PowerPoint presentation from Tom Mayo and the effort to remove the confusion for first responders through renaming certain streets. Mr. Fudala stated that the information had been presented to the Board of Selectmen and standards were established in order to ensure consistency with street naming. Board of Selectmen will rename town roads and the Planning Board will rename private roads. Twenty-six name changes were anticipated for the Planning Board. The Chair noted that homeowners would need to submit address changes but the Town would notify GIS and utilities. There will be a public hearing on March 5 for an East Way street name change.
Flood Zoning article for May Town Meeting-Mr. Fudala stated that the new flood insurance rate maps would go into effect on July 16 of this year and for the Town to participate in the flood insurance program, amendments were needed to the zoning bylaw. Should the maps be delayed, then Mashpee would not have to act on the article. There was discussion regarding an affordability study.
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to submit proposed changes to the Flood Plain Zone provisions of the bylaw as presented. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
C. Rowley Expense Vouchers-Planning Board expenses for December and January totaled $960. Southport expenses for December and January totaled $570.
MOTION: Mr. Balzarini made a motion to pay $960 for December and January. Mr. Kooharian seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to pay Mr. Rowley $570 for his Southport reviews in December and January. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
Vouchers were signed by the Planning Board members.
Old Business
Community Preservation Committee-Ms. Waygan reported that the CPC would be
holding a warrant place holder for the next town meeting for the possible purchase of 32 Collins Lane. The parcel is 3.7 acres and being sold for $160,000 (assessed for $165,300). The parcel is a buildable lot surrounded by Wildlife & Fisheries land and located close to wetlands and the Mashpee River and was part of the Town’s open space plan.
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion that the Planning Board vote to support the acquisition of the lot for open space. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. All voted unanimously.
Discussion of Greenways Proposal and Surrounding Commercial Property-It was
reported that upcoming meetings would be held on February 15, March 15 and April 19 at 1 p.m. in the library. No feedback had been received yet from Mashpee Commons regarding insurance. It was recommended that Mashpee Commons be invited to attend the next meeting.
MMR Military Civilian Community Council-Update of MMR Joint Land Use
Study-No update
Environmental Oversight Committee-No update
Design Review Committee-No update
Charter Review-No update
Historic District Commission-No update
CORRESPONDENCE
-FEMA – Notice of final flood hazard determination for Town of Mashpee
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: Ms. Waygan made a motion to adjourn. Mr. Balzarini seconded the motion. All voted unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:20 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Jennifer M. Clifford
Board Secretary
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
-Charles Rowley 2/5/14 Letter Regarding Ockway Highlands Definitive Plan Review
- Ockway Highlands Issues
-Matt Costa Waiver Request for Ockway Highlands
-Blue Castle Drive Water Quality Report
-Ockway Highlands Stormwater Management Plan
-Brian Wall Declaration of Protective Covenants and Restrictions for Ockway Highlands
-Abutter Hugh Barnes 10/16/13 Letter Regarding Ockway Highlands
-Cape Cod Commission Decision Regarding Bridges at Mashpee
-Stantec Memo Responding to Charles Rowley Review
-Charles Rowley Memo Regarding Savanna’s Path Meeting
-Flood Plain Zoning Bylaw Amendment
-Flood Plain Zone Provisions
-32 Collins Lane for Possible CPC Funded Purchase
-Five Year Action Plan
-Greenways Agendas
-Barnstable Home Consortium
-Quicknotes
-Resourceful Exercise
-Walking School Buses
| 
